Skip to main content

Security report for behmestapribrami.cz

Běh města Příbrami · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Běh města Příbrami is a local event website dedicated to the 32nd annual running race held in Příbram, Czech Republic. The site provides detailed information about the event schedule, registration links, fees, and sponsors. It targets runners and the local community interested in participating or supporting the event. The business model centers on event organization and promotion with partnerships from local sponsors and organizations. The website content is relevant and well-structured, focusing on event details and participant information. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It employs plugins for image galleries and lightbox effects. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks important security headers and does not provide privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. No contact email or security incident response information is available, limiting transparency. The domain registration is consistent with the website's purpose and location, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website is functional and serves its purpose as an event information portal but requires improvements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and contact transparency to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching behmestapribrami.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a small-scale local sports event organizer focused on running events in Příbram. Its market position is localized with partnerships from regional sponsors and sports clubs. The business model relies on event registrations and sponsorships. The target audience includes athletes, families, and local sports enthusiasts. The presence of multiple local partners and sponsors indicates a healthy partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators are limited but the event's longevity (32 years) suggests stable community engagement. Revenue streams likely include registration fees and sponsorship contributions. The website content and partner links reflect a community-oriented approach rather than commercial expansion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring secure data transmission. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which help mitigate common web attacks. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure policies or security incident response contacts, which limits preparedness for security events. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements. No forms or input fields are present on the main page, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement options. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate with room for significant improvements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Provide clear contact information including a contact email and consider adding a secure contact form for user inquiries.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Běh města Příbrami
Description
Běh města Příbrami is an event website for the 32nd annual running event in Příbram, Czech Republic. It provides information about race dates, registration, fees, and sponsors.
Key services
Race event organization, Registration management, Information dissemination
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, WordPress, Responsive Lightbox, Easy Fancybox
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is dedicated to a local running event in Příbram, Czech Republic.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. No contact email addresses found; only phone numbers provided.
  4. No forms detected on the main page; registration is via external link.
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for galleries and lightbox.
  6. No security headers detected in the HTML content.
  7. HTTPS is enabled with canonical URL set.
  8. Structured data (JSON-LD) present for organization and webpage.
  9. Multiple external partner and sponsor links present.
  10. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Bootstrap framework and jQuery library, indicating a standard and widely supported technology stack. It uses plugins for responsive lightbox galleries and fancybox image display. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a clean, professional design. SEO optimization is basic with meta description and canonical tags present but lacks advanced SEO features. Performance is moderate with multiple scripts and stylesheets loaded. Accessibility features are minimal. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The technical infrastructure is adequate for a small event website but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with behmestapribrami.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review behmestapribrami.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.