Skip to main content

Security report for behame.cz

Běháme.cz · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Běháme.cz is a Czech language website dedicated to running, jogging, weight loss, and healthy lifestyle content. Established in 2008, it provides training plans, health and nutrition advice, equipment reviews, and lifestyle blogs targeting recreational runners and health-conscious individuals. The site is monetized primarily through Google Adsense and sponsored content. Technically, it is built on WordPress with common plugins such as All in One SEO and CAPTCHA for spam protection. The site is mobile optimized and uses modern web fonts and icons. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and basic anti-spam measures, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is limited due to absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies, though a cookie consent mechanism is present. No direct contact information or incident response contacts are published, which may affect trust and compliance. Overall, the website is a well-established niche content portal with moderate technical maturity and security hygiene.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching behame.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche in the Czech running and healthy lifestyle market, serving a small but dedicated audience interested in sports training and wellness. Its business model relies on content publishing with advertising and sponsored posts. The presence of partner links suggests some ecosystem collaboration. The site’s longevity since 2008 indicates stable market presence. However, lack of detailed business and contact information limits transparency. The target audience includes amateur runners, fitness enthusiasts, and individuals seeking weight loss and health advice. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital marketing and expanded content offerings.

Security posture

The site uses HTTPS and includes CAPTCHA to mitigate spam, indicating basic security awareness. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to harden against common web attacks. No security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap under GDPR. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with better policy transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Provide clear contact information including a security or abuse contact email for incident reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency by adding terms of service and business contact details.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Běháme.cz
Description
Web o běhání, sportu a zdravém životním stylu. Na webu se dozvíte, jak začít s běháním, jak trénovat, jak běháním zhubnout a další informace ze světa běhu.
Key services
Running training advice, Health and nutrition articles, Sport equipment reviews, Blog and reports on sports and lifestyle
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap CSS (commented but referenced), Google Fonts, FontAwesome, Google Adsense, jQuery (commented but referenced), WP-Emoji, All in One SEO plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap (partial references), WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of CAPTCHA for forms (SI CAPTCHA Anti-Spam)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Czech language content portal focused on running, jogging, and healthy lifestyle.
  2. Content is regularly updated with articles and blog posts.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages found, but cookie consent mechanism is present.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage or visible content.
  5. Uses Google Adsense for monetization.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  7. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins like All in One SEO and CAPTCHA.
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
  9. Good SEO and structured data implementation.
  10. No adult or NSFW content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a mix of custom and standard plugins including All in One SEO and SI CAPTCHA Anti-Spam. It uses Google Fonts and FontAwesome for UI elements and Google Adsense for monetization. The site is mobile responsive with moderate performance. Some CSS and JS files are minified and cached for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. No advanced frameworks beyond Bootstrap references were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a content-driven WordPress site with room for modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with behame.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review behame.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.