Skip to main content

Security report for beets-me.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Beets me is a small-scale WordPress-based website, likely a blog or informational site, with content primarily in Greek and some English alternate language support. The site appears to focus on recipes or food-related content, as inferred from plugin usage and external links. The technical infrastructure is standard for WordPress sites, hosted by Bluehost Inc., and uses common web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Font Awesome. While HTTPS is enabled, the site lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, and the Google Analytics plugin is installed but not configured, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is basic with some content protection scripts in place but no formal security or incident response policies visible. Privacy compliance is weak, with no privacy or cookie policies detected, and no GDPR compliance indicators. Overall, the site is functional but lacks professional business and security documentation, which impacts trust and compliance. Strategic improvements in privacy, security headers, and analytics configuration are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching beets-me.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a small entity, likely a personal or niche blog focused on food or recipes, targeting a general audience in Greece or Greek speakers. The business model appears to be content-driven, possibly monetized through advertising (Google Adsense) and marketing tools like Mailchimp. There is no evidence of formal business registration or certifications, and no contact information is provided, limiting direct customer engagement. The site leverages social media platforms for outreach but lacks visible partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth potential may be limited by the absence of professional business infrastructure and compliance documentation.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic. HTTPS is enforced, and domain transfer protection is enabled, but DNSSEC is not active. No security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options are detected, which could expose the site to common web attacks. The site employs JavaScript-based content protection to disable copying, which may affect usability. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not present, suggesting limited readiness for security incidents. Overall, the site should prioritize implementing security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and establishing privacy and incident response policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable and configure DNSSEC to enhance domain security.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  4. Configure Google Analytics properly or remove the plugin if not used to avoid unnecessary tracking.
  5. Establish clear contact information and incident response channels to improve trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Instagram Widget by WPZOOM, Pinterest RSS Widget, Mailchimp for WP, MonsterInsights (Google Analytics plugin)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Mailchimp for WP, AddThis
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based blog or informational site.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  4. Content protection scripts disable text selection and copying.
  5. Google Analytics plugin installed but not configured.
  6. HTTPS is enabled but no advanced security headers detected.
  7. No DNSSEC enabled for domain.
  8. External links mostly to social media and common web services.
  9. No business or legal entity information found on site.
  10. Site content is in Greek with English alternate language links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with a theme named Juliet and uses several plugins including Instagram Widget by WPZOOM, Pinterest RSS Widget, Mailchimp for WP, and MonsterInsights for Google Analytics. The site loads multiple external resources such as Google Fonts, Font Awesome, and social media SDKs. Performance is moderate with standard modern web technologies but lacks advanced optimization or accessibility features. Mobile optimization is basic, and SEO practices are minimal with some meta tags and Open Graph tags present. The hosting provider is Bluehost Inc., and the domain is registered with them as well. No structured data (JSON-LD) was found, which could improve SEO and rich snippet support.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with beets-me.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review beets-me.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.