Skip to main content

Security report for bedifferent.lv

Different dizaina aģentūra · Other · Latvia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Different dizaina aģentūra is a Latvian graphic design agency offering services including visual identity and logo design, web banners, print and environmental advertising, and website development. The company positions itself as a trusted partner with 10 years of experience serving clients primarily in the Baltic region. The website is built on Squarespace, leveraging modern web technologies and multilingual support via Weglot. The technical infrastructure is solid with HTTPS and HSTS enabled, ensuring secure communications. However, explicit privacy and terms of service policies are absent, which could be improved to enhance compliance and user trust. Contact information is primarily via social media and a contact page, but no direct emails or phone numbers are visible on the main site. Overall, the site presents a professional image with good design and usability.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bedifferent.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
45
Email security
60
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency targets businesses seeking professional graphic design services in Latvia and the Baltic states. Its business model is service-based, focusing on creative and strategic design solutions to enhance client brand recognition and marketing effectiveness. The company leverages social media channels for marketing and client engagement. The lack of detailed business registration data and contact emails on the site slightly limits transparency but is typical for small agencies. The firm appears stable and established, with a consistent brand presence and a portfolio showcased on the site.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and HSTS enabled, protecting user data in transit. No security headers beyond HSTS were explicitly detected in the HTML content, and no vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The absence of a security policy or incident response contact limits the site's readiness for security incidents. The use of third-party scripts like Datadog for logging and Weglot for translation introduces some risk, but no known vulnerable libraries were identified. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced with formal policies and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add explicit contact emails and phone numbers on the website to enhance business credibility and user support.
  3. Implement a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to prepare for incident response and responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users, including those with disabilities.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Different dizaina aģentūra
Description
Mēs piedāvājam uzņēmuma vizuālās identitātes izstrādi, saistošu web baneru veidošanu, iespaidīgu drukātas reklāmas materiālu izveidi un individuāli veidotu mājaslapu izstrādi.
Key services
Visual identity and logo design, Web banners and email campaigns, Print and environmental advertising, Website development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace CMS, Google Fonts, Typekit Fonts, Datadog Browser Logs, Weglot (multilingual)
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HSTS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Datadog Browser Logs
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Datadog Logs
Marketing tools
Weglot multilingual, Squarespace marketing features
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional graphic design agency based in Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian and English with multilingual support.
  3. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented and GDPR compliant.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in HTML.
  7. Contact form likely present on /kontakti page (not fully visible in HTML).
  8. Uses Squarespace CMS and hosting with standard security practices.
  9. No signs of malware, phishing, or suspicious content.
  10. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Squarespace platform, utilizing its CMS and hosting services. It uses modern web fonts from Google Fonts and Adobe Typekit, and includes multilingual support via Weglot. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. The site is mobile responsive and includes basic accessibility features. Security is enforced via HTTPS and HSTS, but additional security headers could be added. The site lacks explicit SEO meta tags beyond basics but includes Open Graph and Twitter card metadata for social sharing. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bedifferent.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bedifferent.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.