Skip to main content

Security report for becybersafe.be

Partial score · DNS & email only

65/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching becybersafe.be

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
65

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BeCyberSafe operates in the cybersecurity education sector targeting SMEs in Belgium, a market segment that increasingly requires affordable and accessible cyber resilience resources. The business model revolves around providing free or accessible content such as webinars and podcasts to raise awareness and educate business owners. The platform leverages partnerships with known service providers like Google and Cookiebot for analytics and compliance. The lack of explicit contact details and corporate registration information suggests a small-sized operation focused on content delivery rather than direct sales or services. The platform's market position is that of a trusted educational resource, supported by consistent branding and professional website design. Growth potential lies in expanding content offerings and formalizing compliance and security disclosures to build further trust.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a presumably strong SSL configuration, uses Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate bot traffic, and implements a cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot, indicating awareness of privacy regulations like GDPR. However, the absence of explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages, lack of visible security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options), and no published vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts represent gaps in compliance and security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The domain WHOIS privacy protection is justified for this business type. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but could be enhanced by publishing comprehensive policies and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages with clear links accessible from the homepage.
  2. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Add a security.txt file and provide explicit contact information for security incident reporting and vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Include verified company contact information such as official emails and phone numbers to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are in use and maintain up-to-date versions.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BeCyberSafe
Description
BeCyberSafe is een online platform die je als kmo helpt om cyberweerbaar te worden en je zaak te beschermen tegen cyberaanvallen.
Key services
Webinars, Podcasts, Cybersecurity documentation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, jQuery 3.7.1, Google reCAPTCHA
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected
  2. WHOIS data is restricted by registry policy, limiting domain registration transparency
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the analyzed content
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage content
  6. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with SEO and analytics integrations
  7. Security best practices partially implemented; missing some HTTP security headers
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security incident contact information present
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with becybersafe.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review becybersafe.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.