Skip to main content

Security report for beautyfootcup.cz

LDEkonom · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 14 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

38/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Beauty Foot Cup Czech is a niche event organizer specializing in professional pedicure competitions within the Czech Republic. The website promotes the competition, its vision, sponsors, and related information targeting professional pedicurists and interested public. The business operates on a small scale with sponsorship support and aims to elevate pedicure standards and awareness. Technically, the site uses legacy JavaScript libraries like jQuery 1.11 and jQuery UI, along with Swiper for sliders and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile but lacks advanced accessibility and SEO features. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage and anonymized Google Analytics tracking, but no visible security headers or modern security practices. The absence of privacy, cookie, and terms policies is a compliance gap. WHOIS data is unavailable, raising concerns about domain registration legitimacy, although the site content and sponsors suggest a legitimate operation. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and domain legitimacy verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

14 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching beautyfootcup.cz

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
38

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a specialized sector organizing professional pedicure competitions, leveraging sponsorships from industry-related companies. Its market position is niche but established since 2017. The business model focuses on event management and promotion within the beauty and healthcare sector. The target audience includes professional pedicurists and the general public interested in foot care. The partnership ecosystem includes recognized brands in pedicure equipment and products. Growth potential depends on expanding awareness and improving regulatory clarity in the Czech pedicure market. The lack of clear contact information and privacy policies may limit trust and professional outreach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and anonymized Google Analytics tracking. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries like jQuery 1.11 poses potential vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating limited security governance. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also suggests non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with significant room for improvement to protect user data and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add and configure essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Upgrade JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  4. Verify and publish domain WHOIS information to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and user support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LDEkonom
Description
Beauty Foot Cup Czech is an independent international professional pedicure competition in the Czech Republic. It aims to promote pedicure as an important and professional field of care for healthy, tired, and defective feet. The competition was founded in 2017 to raise awareness and improve legislation and standards in pedicure and podology in the Czech Republic.
Key services
Organizing professional pedicure competitions, Promoting pedicure education and standards, Providing sponsorship opportunities
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.0, jQuery UI 1.10.3, Swiper slider, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by og:url and external scripts loaded via HTTPS)
  • Anonymize IP in Google Analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the main page.
  4. Social media presence limited to Facebook link only.
  5. Use of outdated jQuery version may pose security risks.
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  7. Content is professional and focused on pedicure competition and education.
  8. WHOIS data is missing, which is a significant concern for domain legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional tech stack with jQuery 1.11, jQuery UI, and Swiper slider for UI components. Google Fonts and Font Awesome are used for typography and icons. Google Analytics is integrated with IP anonymization. The site loads resources mostly from CDNs and local theme folders. The HTML structure is valid but lacks modern semantic elements and accessibility features. Mobile optimization is basic with viewport meta tag but no advanced responsive design detected. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data like JSON-LD present. Performance is moderate but could be improved by updating libraries and optimizing assets. Hosting provider and CMS are not identifiable from the data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with beautyfootcup.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review beautyfootcup.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.