Beastiality.club is a niche adult content website specializing in extreme and illegal bestiality and zoophilia pornography. The site offers a large archive of videos and images, targeting an adults-only audience interested in this controversial content. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and several plugins including Yoast SEO and WP Statistics. The site is moderately optimized for SEO and performance but lacks advanced security measures such as security headers and DNSSEC. The domain is registered with privacy protection, which is consistent with the nature of the content but reduces transparency and trust. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact information is provided, indicating poor compliance with privacy regulations and business credibility standards. Overall, the site poses significant legal and ethical concerns due to its content and lacks fundamental security and compliance practices.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention beastiality.club, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for beastiality.club right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The website operates in a highly niche and illegal adult content market, focusing on bestiality and zoophilia. Its business model appears to be content archival and distribution, possibly monetized through downloads or memberships, though no explicit monetization details are visible. The site targets adult users interested in extreme pornography. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS and lack of contact info suggests an intent to remain anonymous due to the illegal nature of the content. The site has moderate SEO presence but lacks trust signals such as certifications or transparent business information. The partnership ecosystem is unclear, with no identified partners or subsidiaries. Growth indicators are limited due to lack of public business data.
Security posture
The website has a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled but lacks DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No incident response or security policies are published. The use of privacy-protected WHOIS is typical for controversial sites but reduces accountability. The site uses standard WordPress plugins which may introduce vulnerabilities if not regularly updated. No exposed sensitive data was detected, but the absence of security best practices and compliance policies indicates a low maturity level in security. The site is vulnerable to potential attacks due to missing security headers and lack of visible security controls.
Recommendations
Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
Enable DNSSEC and add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security posture.
Provide clear contact information and incident response contacts to improve business credibility and compliance.
Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Consider transparency improvements to reduce suspicion and improve trustworthiness despite the controversial content.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
beast.club
Description
Real Bestiality Porn And Extreme Zoophilia Archives. Extreme Pornography Bestiality And Rare Exclusive Archives And Hardcore Zoo Sex. Large Collections Of Vintage Animal Porn Movies And Retro Zoo Sex Magazines
Key services
Hosting and distribution of bestiality pornographic videos and images, Archival of rare and vintage animal sex content, Categorized adult content browsing
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate
Technology
Stack
WordPress 6.6.2, Yoast SEO Premium, jQuery, Avada Theme, Fusion Builder, WP User Avatar Plugin, WP Statistics
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enabled
Domain status clientTransferProhibited
Analytics and tracking
Services
WP Statistics, Histats.com
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Tracking pixels
Histats.com
Transparency
poor
Site quality
Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low
Key observations
Website hosts illegal and extreme adult content involving animals
No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies
No contact emails or phone numbers found
Uses WordPress with Avada theme and several plugins
No security headers detected
Domain registered with privacy protection
Moderate SEO optimization via Yoast plugin
Tracking via WP Statistics and Histats
No visible security or incident response policies
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on a standard WordPress CMS with the Avada theme and several plugins including Yoast SEO and WP Statistics. It uses jQuery and other common JavaScript libraries. The site is hosted with DNS managed by Cloudflare, but DNSSEC is not enabled. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO Premium plugin. The site lacks advanced security configurations and modern security headers. The technical infrastructure is typical for small adult content sites but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with beastiality.club. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review beastiality.club.