Skip to main content

Security report for bdc-enschede.nl

BDC Enschede · Manufacturing · Netherlands

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BDC Enschede is a specialized small business based in the Netherlands focusing on the design, manufacturing, installation, and maintenance of fire-resistant doors and related fire safety products. The company targets organizations and businesses requiring fire safety solutions, positioning itself as a niche specialist in this sector. The website reflects this focus with detailed product categories and service offerings. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Yoast SEO and uses Google Analytics for tracking. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but lacks advanced accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks important security headers and visible privacy or cookie policies, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bdc-enschede.nl

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BDC Enschede operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on fire safety products, serving a specialized market niche. The business model combines product manufacturing with installation and maintenance services, providing a comprehensive solution to clients. The company has maintained a consistent online presence since 2013, indicating stability. The website content and structure suggest a focus on B2B customers in the Netherlands. The lack of privacy and security policies may reflect a smaller scale operation or limited digital maturity. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. The company uses standard digital marketing tools but does not appear to engage in extensive online advertising or affiliate programs.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks important HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which could mitigate common web attacks. No security or incident response policies are published, and there is no vulnerability disclosure mechanism or security.txt file. The contact information is clearly provided, but no dedicated security contact channels are visible. The use of WordPress and common plugins necessitates regular updates to avoid vulnerabilities, but no specific vulnerabilities were detected in the content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with basic security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement essential HTTP security headers to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Add a security policy page and a vulnerability disclosure mechanism (e.g., security.txt) to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience and compliance with accessibility standards.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins and conduct security audits to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
BDC Enschede
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BDC Enschede
Description
BDC-Enschede specializes in fire-resistant doors, including design, manufacturing, installation, and maintenance services. They offer a range of products such as fire-resistant sliding doors, steel hinged doors, roll shutters, and steel constructions.
Key services
Design and manufacturing of fire-resistant doors, Installation (montage), Periodic maintenance (onderhoud), Supply of fire-resistant seals and fittings
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, FlexSlider, PrettyPhoto, Google Analytics
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure forms (search form present)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based business site specializing in fire-resistant doors.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with email, phone, and physical address.
  4. Use of Google Analytics indicates user tracking but no visible cookie consent.
  5. No visible security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  6. Content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
  7. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  8. Site uses Yoast SEO plugin and structured data for SEO optimization.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS version 6.8.3 with Yoast SEO plugin for search engine optimization. It uses jQuery and several JavaScript libraries for UI components such as FlexSlider and PrettyPhoto. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. The site loads CSS and JS resources from its own domain and trusted external sources. The HTML is well-structured with JSON-LD structured data for SEO. Performance is moderate with no evident critical errors, but mobile optimization is basic. Accessibility features are minimal. The site does not use advanced frameworks or modern JavaScript libraries beyond jQuery. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found in the content. Overall, the technical implementation is standard for a small business WordPress site but could benefit from modernization and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bdc-enschede.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bdc-enschede.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.