Skip to main content

Security report for bcseventos.com.br

BCS Eventos · Other · Brazil

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BCS Eventos is a Brazilian company specializing in intelligent solutions for events such as fairs, congresses, and shows. Established in 1997, it has served over 1,000 events and offers a comprehensive event management platform called SIGEVENT, alongside technical support and equipment rental services. The company targets event organizers and managers, positioning itself as an experienced and reliable provider in the event technology sector. Technically, the website is hosted on KingHost with an Apache server and uses modern JavaScript libraries and Google Fonts, but lacks HTTPS security and advanced security headers. The site is professionally designed with good content quality and navigation, though performance data is limited. Security posture is weak due to missing SSL certificate and security headers, posing risks to user data and trust. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires significant security improvements to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bcseventos.com.br

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
90
GDPR outside view
25
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BCS Eventos operates in the event management technology sector, offering a SaaS platform combined with on-site technical support and equipment rental. Its competitive advantage lies in its 25 years of experience and a comprehensive platform that adapts to evolving market needs. The business model includes recurring revenue from platform subscriptions and service fees for support and rentals. The company maintains an active social media presence and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating a moderate digital marketing maturity. Growth indicators include a broad client base and continuous platform development. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified beyond hosting with KingHost. The company’s operations are focused in Brazil, targeting medium-sized event organizers.

Security posture

The website’s security posture is currently weak. The absence of a valid SSL certificate means all traffic is unencrypted, exposing users to interception risks. No HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are implemented, increasing vulnerability to common web attacks. The lack of HSTS and OCSP stapling further reduces SSL effectiveness. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, indicating limited formal security governance. While no known vulnerabilities or malware were detected, the missing HTTPS is a critical issue that severely impacts trust and compliance. The site does not implement GDPR compliance indicators beyond a basic privacy policy. Overall, the security maturity is low and requires urgent remediation.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Enable HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload directives to enforce HTTPS usage.
  4. Develop and publish a comprehensive cookie policy and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  5. Establish and communicate an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security governance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses an Apache 2.4.52 server on Ubuntu, hosted by KingHost. The front-end employs JavaScript libraries such as Barba.js for page transitions, Feather Icons for UI icons, and Swiper.js for sliders. Google Fonts are used for typography. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and tracking. The site lacks HTTPS support and modern TLS protocols, which is a significant technical deficiency. Performance metrics are unavailable, but the site appears to have moderate mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no structured data. The site does not use a known CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but outdated in security and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bcseventos.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bcseventos.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.