Skip to main content

Security report for bcorpmonth.com

B Lab Global · Other · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

B Corp Month is a professionally designed website hosted on Squarespace, representing the B Corp movement and B Lab Global. It serves as an informational and community engagement platform promoting certified B Corporations worldwide. The site features regional directories, event listings, and social media integration to foster awareness and participation in sustainable business practices. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Squarespace CMS, Google Tag Manager, and Typekit fonts, delivering a moderate performance with good mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and HSTS enabled, though it lacks some advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable anomaly, potentially indicating privacy protection or a recent domain registration, which slightly impacts trust. Overall, the site is credible, well-branded, and safe for general audiences, but would benefit from enhanced privacy policies and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bcorpmonth.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a global advocate for the B Corp movement, targeting businesses and individuals interested in sustainable and socially responsible business practices. It operates as a non-profit advocacy platform, promoting certification and community involvement. The business model focuses on awareness, education, and event promotion rather than direct commercial transactions. The site leverages partnerships and social media to extend its reach. While no direct revenue streams or parent company affiliations are disclosed, the brand is well recognized in the sustainability sector. The lack of explicit contact details and privacy policies suggests room for improvement in transparency and compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and HSTS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications and protection against protocol downgrade attacks. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate risks like cross-site scripting and clickjacking. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates gaps in compliance and readiness. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, but no explicit data retention or privacy compliance statements were found. Overall, the site is secure but could enhance its compliance and defense-in-depth measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance statements and enable cookie consent mechanisms.
  3. Provide visible contact information for security incidents and designate a Data Protection Officer or privacy contact.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts such as Google Tag Manager to minimize security risks.
  5. Enhance transparency by including WHOIS registration details or domain ownership information to improve trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
B Lab Global
Description
Certified B Corporations™ believe there’s a better path to a better world—one of action and purpose, inspiration and community. This movement is powered by an emerging generation of people using business as a force for good. The site celebrates the work of thousands of B Corps around the world, promoting collective impact and encouraging support or becoming a B Corp.
Key services
Information dissemination, Community engagement, Event promotion, Regional B Corp directories
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace CMS, Google Tag Manager, Typekit Fonts, Plyr Video Player
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HSTS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Squarespace with professional design and branding consistent with B Corp movement.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, which is unusual and lowers trust slightly.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage or main sections.
  5. Social media presence is strong with official B Corp accounts linked.
  6. Security posture is good with HTTPS and HSTS but lacks advanced security headers.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is business and community focused.
  8. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content is fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Squarespace platform, utilizing its CMS capabilities along with integrated services like Google Tag Manager for analytics and Typekit for font management. The site employs modern HTML5 and CSS3 standards with responsive design for mobile optimization. Video content is delivered via the Plyr video player. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by media content and third-party scripts. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and semantic markup. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data but lacks advanced structured data beyond basic JSON-LD for website and local business schema. Hosting is managed by Squarespace, providing reliable uptime and SSL certificates. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and SEO optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bcorpmonth.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bcorpmonth.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.