Skip to main content

Security report for bayern-innovativ.de

Bayern Innovativ · Government · Germany

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bayern Innovativ is a publicly commissioned innovation support organization based in Bavaria, Germany, established in 1995. It focuses on fostering innovation by connecting businesses, research institutions, and organizations through networks, services, and events. The organization supports the entire innovation lifecycle, from idea development to market introduction, with a strong emphasis on sectors such as energy, transportation, healthcare, manufacturing, and creative industries. Their market position is well-established as a key facilitator of innovation in the Bavarian economy. Technically, the website is built on TYPO3 CMS and incorporates modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and various third-party services such as ReadSpeaker for accessibility and Google Tag Manager for marketing analytics. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility features, though performance is somewhat slow with a high load time and resource count. From a security perspective, the site supports TLS 1.3 and 1.2 with no known SSL vulnerabilities, but lacks advanced security headers like HSTS and DNSSEC. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented comprehensively, supporting GDPR compliance. Certifications such as ISO 37301 and audit badges enhance trustworthiness. However, no explicit security or incident response policies are publicly available. Overall, Bayern Innovativ presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence with room for improvement in security hardening and performance optimization. Strategic enhancements in these areas would strengthen their security posture and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bayern-innovativ.de

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
87
Security headers
25
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
50
GDPR outside view
18
Average
53
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bayern Innovativ operates as an essential innovation facilitator in Bavaria, targeting SMEs and research entities. Its competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive innovation networks and services, including funding guidance and internationalization support via the Enterprise Europe Network. Revenue streams likely include public funding and service contracts. The organization maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with government bodies and industry players. Growth indicators include active event management and digital platform utilization. The company’s strategic focus on emerging sectors and innovation management positions it well within the regional innovation ecosystem.

Security posture

The current security maturity is moderate. The website employs modern TLS protocols and has no critical SSL vulnerabilities. Email security is supported by SPF records. However, the absence of HSTS, DNSSEC, and CAA records indicates gaps in DNS and transport security. The cookie consent implementation aligns with GDPR, but no incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are evident. Data protection officer contact details are not publicly disclosed. Overall, the security culture appears compliant but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to secure DNS queries and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add CAA DNS records to restrict certificate issuance to authorized CAs.
  4. Enable OCSP stapling to improve SSL certificate revocation checking performance and security.
  5. Optimize SSL/TLS cipher suites to explicitly allow only strong ciphers and disable weak or legacy ones.
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is based on TYPO3 CMS, leveraging Bootstrap and jQuery for frontend responsiveness and interactivity. Integration with third-party services like ReadSpeaker enhances accessibility. The site uses Google Tag Manager and etracker for analytics and Userlike for live chat support. Hosting is managed via domaincontrol.com DNS servers. Performance metrics indicate a slow load time (~10.9 seconds) and a large number of resources (141), suggesting potential for optimization. Mobile and accessibility features are well implemented, but technical debt exists in security header configurations and SSL enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bayern-innovativ.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bayern-innovativ.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.