Skip to main content

Security report for baumeister.de

Other · Germany

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.baumeister.de represents a German-language site branded as 'Baumeister'. The content and metadata suggest it is related to construction or a similar sector, though explicit business descriptions are not present in the provided data. The site uses WordPress CMS with Astra theme and incorporates SEO and performance optimization plugins such as Yoast SEO and WP Rocket. A cookie consent mechanism is implemented via BorlabsCookie, indicating some level of privacy compliance awareness. However, no explicit privacy policy, terms of service, or contact information are found in the analyzed content, which limits transparency and user trust. Technically, the site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness but lacks visible security headers and detailed security policies. The domain WHOIS data shows consistent DNS name servers aligned with German hosting providers, supporting legitimacy, though registrant details are minimal. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy disclosures and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
60/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching baumeister.de

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
60
Average
53
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind www.baumeister.de appears to be a small-sized entity operating in Germany, likely in the construction or related industry given the brand name. The site targets German-speaking users and uses standard WordPress infrastructure. The lack of detailed business descriptions, contact details, or certifications suggests a modest market presence. The use of SEO and performance plugins indicates an intent to maintain visibility and user experience. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the data. The business model and revenue streams are not discernible from the content. The presence of a Twitter account suggests some social media engagement. Overall, the business intelligence points to a small, possibly local or niche player with room for digital maturity improvements.

Security posture

Security posture is moderate but with notable gaps. The site uses HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The cookie consent mechanism is a positive indicator for privacy compliance. No vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security policies are published, limiting transparency and preparedness. No signs of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the provided content. The absence of contact information for security incidents or a data protection officer reduces the site's compliance maturity. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and establishing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website appears to be related to 'Baumeister' brand, likely German language content. No explicit business description found in provided content.
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, BorlabsCookie, Yoast SEO, WP Rocket
Frameworks
Astra Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
BorlabsCookie
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, WP Rocket
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided content.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via BorlabsCookie plugin.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Website uses WordPress CMS with Astra theme and common plugins like Yoast SEO and WP Rocket.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in the provided data.
  7. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files found.
  8. No data protection officer contact information found.
  9. Content is in German language and appears professional but limited in business descriptive content.
  10. No suspicious or malicious indicators found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Astra theme, enhanced with plugins like Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and WP Rocket for performance optimization. Fonts are locally hosted or loaded from trusted CDNs. The site uses BorlabsCookie for cookie consent management, indicating GDPR awareness. The HTML structure is valid and includes responsive design elements for mobile optimization. However, no advanced security headers or modern security frameworks are detected. Performance is moderate with preloading of fonts and scripts. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site lacks visible analytics or tracking services beyond cookie management. Hosting provider details are not explicit but DNS name servers suggest German hosting. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small to medium WordPress site with room for security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with baumeister.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review baumeister.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.