Skip to main content

Security report for bauerandcottrell.co.uk

Bauer & Cottrell · Other · United Kingdom

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bauer & Cottrell is a UK-based specialist consultancy focused on IR35 compliance and Off-Payroll Working advice, targeting contractors and businesses. The company positions itself as an expert with over 20 years of experience in this niche, offering advisory and compliance services. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and Elementor, integrating modern tools such as Gravity Forms, Google Analytics, and Tawk.to live chat to support user engagement and data collection. The technical infrastructure reflects a mature digital presence with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and reCAPTCHA implemented, though some security headers and formal policies are missing. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain naming irregularities, which introduces some uncertainty about domain legitimacy, but the website content and branding are consistent and professional. Overall, the site demonstrates a good balance of business credibility and technical implementation, with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bauerandcottrell.co.uk

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a specialized consulting sector addressing IR35 compliance, a critical regulatory area in the UK affecting contractors and businesses. Its market positioning as a trusted expert with two decades of experience suggests a stable client base and niche authority. The business model revolves around providing expert advice and compliance services, likely generating revenue through consulting fees. The website targets contractors and businesses needing IR35 guidance, indicating a B2B focus. The presence on social media platforms like X (Twitter) and LinkedIn supports professional networking and marketing. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, indicating an independent small business. The lack of explicit contact details on the homepage may limit direct lead capture but is mitigated by integrated contact forms and live chat.

Security posture

Security measures include HTTPS with SSL, Google reCAPTCHA on forms to prevent spam, and no visible exposure of sensitive data in the HTML. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces defense-in-depth. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. Privacy and cookie policies are not found, which may impact GDPR compliance and user trust. The WHOIS domain irregularity is a concern but does not directly affect site security. Overall, the security posture is moderate with good baseline protections but lacking in advanced security practices and formal compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen security posture.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  4. Improve accessibility features to meet compliance standards and broaden user inclusivity.
  5. Investigate and resolve domain WHOIS irregularities to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce trust concerns.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bauer & Cottrell
Description
Bauer & Cottrell have been trusted IR35 compliance experts for over 20 years, providing specialist IR35 & Off-Payroll Working advice and services to contractors and businesses.
Key services
IR35 compliance advice, Off-Payroll Working services, Contractor services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Gravity Forms, Google Analytics (MonsterInsights), Tawk.to live chat, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced with SSL
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain naming rules violation.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage HTML.
  4. Contact information such as emails or phone numbers are not explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Site uses modern WordPress technologies and plugins.
  6. Google Analytics and Tawk.to live chat are integrated.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  9. Content is focused on IR35 compliance consulting services.
  10. No suspicious or malicious scripts detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder and Gravity Forms plugin, indicating a modern and flexible CMS environment. Integration of Google Analytics via MonsterInsights and Tawk.to live chat shows active user engagement and analytics tracking. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets, some minified and cached, suggesting performance optimization efforts. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO metadata is well implemented with Yoast SEO plugin. However, no explicit hosting provider information is found. The site could benefit from enhanced security headers and formal privacy documentation. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could be improved with additional security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bauerandcottrell.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bauerandcottrell.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.