Skip to main content

Security report for batery.in

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

68/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website batery-bets.in is currently inaccessible beyond a Cloudflare Turnstile security challenge page, which blocks direct content access. No business information, contact details, or policies are visible. The site appears to be small or newly registered with privacy-protected WHOIS data, limiting trust and legitimacy assessment. The technical infrastructure relies on Cloudflare for security and hosting, but no further technology or CMS details are available. The security posture cannot be fully evaluated due to lack of accessible content and headers. Overall, the site presents a low trust profile with minimal transparency and no visible compliance or security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching batery.in

This scan found 15 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
Average
68

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of accessible content and absence of business or contact information, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain uses privacy protection, which is common for small or potentially suspicious sites. No partnerships, market positioning, or business model details are available. The site does not display any branding or trust indicators, and no external business-related domains are linked.

Security posture

The security posture is difficult to assess fully because the site is behind a Cloudflare WAF challenge page. While HTTPS is implied by Cloudflare usage, no security headers or policies are visible. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present to evaluate input security. The use of Cloudflare Turnstile indicates some level of bot mitigation. However, the lack of transparency and privacy-protected WHOIS data reduce trustworthiness. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is found.

Recommendations

  1. Make website content publicly accessible beyond WAF challenge for proper analysis and user access.
  2. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and trust.
  3. Provide verifiable contact information including emails and phone numbers for business credibility.
  4. Implement and disclose security policies and incident response contacts to enhance security posture.
  5. Consider reducing WHOIS privacy protection if the business is legitimate to improve transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Page is a Cloudflare security challenge page with Turnstile captcha verifying human visitor. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare Turnstile, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to Cloudflare Turnstile challenge
  2. No visible business or contact information
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms policies found
  4. No forms or data collection fields visible
  5. No external business-related links except Cloudflare domains
  6. No social media or email contacts found
  7. No security headers or certificates details available
  8. Site likely small or newly registered with privacy WHOIS
  9. Content quality and professionalism are poor due to lack of content
  10. No advertising or analytics scripts detected beyond Cloudflare challenge
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Cloudflare for hosting and security, including the Turnstile CAPTCHA for bot protection. The HTML is minimal and serves only the challenge page with no additional content or metadata such as Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. No CMS or frameworks are detected. Performance is moderate due to Cloudflare's infrastructure, but mobile optimization and SEO are poor given the lack of content. Accessibility is basic with minimal semantic HTML. No analytics or advertising scripts are present beyond Cloudflare's challenge scripts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with batery.in. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review batery.in.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.