Skip to main content

Security report for bastioni.lv

MILEX SIA · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MILEX SIA operates the Bastioni.lv website, specializing in the wholesale and retail of bastions for military, civil defense, household, and entertainment applications. The company represents well-known brands such as HESCO and offers certified products with an engineering team to support custom solutions. The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies and CDN hosting for performance and availability. The site is mobile-optimized and provides clear navigation and professional content relevant to its target audience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and secure form handling, but lacks advanced security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no visible privacy or cookie policies. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy business presence with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bastioni.lv

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets military and civil defense sectors, as well as households and entertainment parks, positioning itself as a key distributor and producer of bastion products in Latvia. Its partnership with recognized brands like HESCO enhances its market credibility. The business model combines wholesale, retail, and production services, catering to a niche but essential market segment. Contact information and physical presence in Riga support its legitimacy. The website content and branding are consistent, supporting a professional image. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital marketing and compliance improvements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder rapid response to security events. The contact form uses validation but lacks visible anti-bot or CAPTCHA mechanisms. Privacy compliance is weak, with no cookie consent or privacy policy, potentially exposing the company to regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, security practices are functional but could be significantly enhanced.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve security posture.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy, including a security contact email.
  4. Integrate a cookie consent mechanism to inform users and obtain consent for tracking.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "WATEX"
Registration number
40003712811
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MILEX SIA
Description
MILEX SIA is a company engaged in wholesale and retail of various types of bastions intended for military, firefighting, rescue services, household needs, and entertainment parks such as paintball, laser tag, and airsoft. They offer a wide range of products including simple bastions and technologically complex projects, representing well-known brands like HESCO. All products are certified and guaranteed to meet quality and safety standards. The company also has a production and engineering team to provide effective solutions.
Key services
Wholesale and retail of bastions, Production and engineering solutions, Representation of international brands
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
Tilda
Platforms
Tilda CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Tilda Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Tilda Stats
Marketing tools
Tilda forms
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses Tilda CMS and CDN services.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented including email, phone, physical address, and contact form.
  4. No social media links detected.
  5. Website content is professional and relevant to military and civil defense bastion products.
  6. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information available.
  8. No advertising networks detected except Tilda's own stats tracking.
  9. Forms collect name, email, and company information with validation.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, using modern HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript technologies. It leverages Tilda's CDN for hosting static assets, ensuring moderate performance and availability. The site is mobile responsive with good design quality and clear navigation. However, accessibility features are basic and SEO optimization is minimal. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. The use of multiple asynchronous scripts and lazy loading improves load times. Opportunities exist to improve technical SEO, accessibility compliance, and implement advanced security headers to reduce risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bastioni.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bastioni.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.