Skip to main content

Security report for barrierefrei.bayern

Other · Germany

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, DNS health and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website barrierefrei.bayern hosts a viewer's choice contest within a Telegram community, aiming to engage users and generate leads through social activation. The platform is designed with a modern, mobile-responsive interface and leverages SVG and JavaScript for interactive voting features. However, the site lacks critical compliance elements such as privacy and cookie policies, and no contact information is provided, which limits trust and transparency. The domain is expired, posing a risk to availability and credibility. Security posture is moderate with no advanced protections or headers detected. Overall, the site serves a niche community engagement purpose but requires improvements in compliance, security, and business transparency to enhance trust and operational stability.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Critical

      Domain Expired

      Domain expired 11 days ago

      What to do: Renew domain registration immediately

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching barrierefrei.bayern

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
95
Email security
60
DNS health
20
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired · found on this site
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small-scale community engagement platform focused on Telegram users, leveraging contests to increase audience reach and lead generation. Its market position is niche, targeting social media users interested in interactive contests. The business model relies on organic growth via social capital activation without evident monetization or certifications. The lack of contact and compliance information suggests an informal or early-stage operation. Growth potential exists if compliance and security are improved, and if business information is made more transparent.

Security posture

The security maturity is basic. The domain is expired, which is a critical issue that must be addressed immediately. No DNSSEC is enabled, and no security headers are detected, exposing the site to potential risks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The site uses HTTPS, which is positive, but overall security practices are minimal. Recommendations include renewing the domain, enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and implementing privacy compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Renew the domain registration immediately to prevent service disruption and maintain trust.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and increase transparency.
  4. Introduce security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve security posture.
  5. Provide clear contact information and incident response channels to build trust and enable security reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website hosts a viewer's choice contest within a Telegram group to identify the most popular community participant based on open voting. The contest aims to generate targeted leads and expand the user funnel by leveraging participants' social capital and organic audience growth.
Key services
Organizing viewer's choice contests, Facilitating voting and audience engagement, Lead generation through social activation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts (Inter), SVG
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a contest platform integrated with Telegram for voting.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers provided.
  4. Domain is expired which may affect availability.
  5. No security headers detected in provided data.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. Content is in Russian language targeting Telegram users.
  8. No social media links or business contact info found.
  9. Design is modern and mobile responsive.
  10. No explicit or adult content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses standard modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and Google Fonts. It is mobile responsive and visually appealing with animated SVG progress indicators. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected, indicating a custom or static site. Hosting is via a registrar-associated provider. Performance is moderate with no heavy external dependencies. SEO and accessibility are basic but adequate for the site's purpose. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, which reduces privacy concerns but also limits marketing insights.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with barrierefrei.bayern. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review barrierefrei.bayern.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.