Skip to main content

Security report for bankofengland.co.uk

Bank of England · Government · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Bank of England website serves as the official digital presence of the UK's central bank, providing comprehensive information on monetary policy, financial stability, banknotes, and regulatory functions. It targets a broad audience including UK residents, financial institutions, researchers, and policymakers. The site offers authoritative content with a clear mission to promote monetary and financial stability in the UK. The business model is government-centric, focusing on public service and regulatory oversight, positioning the Bank of England as a key institution in the UK's financial ecosystem. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, CSS, service workers, and integrates with Akamai CDN for hosting and performance optimization. It uses Google Tag Manager and Akamai mPulse for analytics and performance monitoring. The site is well optimized for mobile devices, accessible, and SEO-friendly, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses service workers for caching, and implements cookie consent mechanisms. However, explicit security headers and a published security policy or incident response contacts are absent. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data confirms the legitimacy and consistency of the domain registration with the Bank of England's identity. Overall, the website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance with privacy regulations. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and adding vulnerability disclosure information to further strengthen security posture and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
63/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bankofengland.co.uk

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
63
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Bank of England holds a dominant market position as the UK's central bank, providing essential services such as monetary policy management, financial stability oversight, and prudential regulation. Its business model is government-funded and focused on public interest rather than commercial revenue. The website reflects a strong brand with consistent messaging and a comprehensive content offering that supports its mission. The presence of official social media channels and a partner research blog indicates an active engagement strategy. The Bank's operations are large-scale, serving diverse stakeholders including government entities, financial markets, and the general public. The website's content and structure support transparency and public education, reinforcing its authoritative role.

Security posture

The Bank of England website exhibits a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS enforcement and modern web security practices such as service workers and cookie consent. The absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies represent areas for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found, indicating good internal security hygiene. The site’s integration with reputable CDNs and analytics providers further supports secure and reliable operations. Overall, the security maturity is high but could benefit from enhanced transparency and additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  5. Enhance user privacy transparency by detailing data retention policies and cookie usage in accessible formats.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Bank of England
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bank of England
Description
The Bank of England (BoE) is the UK's central bank. Our mission is to deliver monetary and financial stability for the people of the United Kingdom.
Key services
Monetary policy management, Financial stability oversight, Banknote issuance and management, Prudential regulation, Research and statistics publication, Education and public engagement
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Service Workers, Google Tag Manager, Akamai CDN, Cludo Search
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (canonical URL is HTTPS)
  • Service worker implemented for performance and caching
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Akamai mPulse
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Akamai mPulse
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
  2. Clear and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism.
  3. No visible security or compliance red flags.
  4. Strong brand presence with consistent messaging and official social media links.
  5. No contact emails explicitly listed; phone numbers and physical addresses are provided.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimization techniques.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, with advanced features like service workers for offline support and performance optimization. It leverages Akamai CDN for hosting and content delivery, ensuring fast load times and global availability. Google Tag Manager and Akamai mPulse are used for analytics and performance monitoring. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with clear navigation and SEO best practices implemented. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. The technical infrastructure is robust, supporting the Bank's need for reliability and security in delivering critical financial information.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bankofengland.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bankofengland.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.