Skip to main content

Security report for bambosh.dev

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website bambosh.dev serves as a personal online presence for an individual known as Bambosh, providing links to their projects, social media profiles, and a donation channel via PayPal. The site is minimalistic, primarily informational, and targets a general audience interested in the individual's work or online persona. The business model is personal branding and community engagement rather than commercial enterprise. Technically, the site is built with basic HTML and CSS, enhanced with Font Awesome icons, and hosted on GitHub Pages, indicating a lightweight and fast-loading infrastructure with good mobile optimization but limited advanced features or frameworks. Security posture is minimal; no HTTPS status was explicitly provided, no security headers or policies are present, and no forms or data collection mechanisms exist, reducing the attack surface but also limiting user interaction. Privacy and compliance measures are absent, with no privacy or cookie policies, and no contact information for incident response or data protection officers. Overall, the site is low risk but lacks professional security and compliance maturity. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy policies, and contact transparency are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bambosh.dev

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bambosh.dev operates as a personal portfolio and social hub for the individual Bambosh, focusing on sharing personal projects and social media presence. The site leverages partnerships with platforms like PayPal for donations, indicating a revenue stream based on community support. The target audience includes followers of the individual's work and internet community members interested in related projects. The business model is non-commercial and personal, with no evidence of formal company structure or commercial services. The site’s market position is niche and personal, with limited scalability or commercial impact. The partnership ecosystem is minimal, primarily relying on external social media and payment platforms. Growth indicators and strategic business operations are not evident from the site content.

Security posture

The security maturity of bambosh.dev is low but acceptable for a personal site with minimal data collection. The absence of HTTPS information is a concern; if HTTPS is not enforced, this is a critical issue. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options are detected, which are recommended best practices. No forms or input fields reduce the risk of injection or data leakage vulnerabilities. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR. Incident response mechanisms and contact channels for security issues are not provided, limiting the ability to respond to potential incidents. Overall, the site presents a low attack surface but would benefit from implementing basic security headers, HTTPS enforcement, and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS across the entire site to ensure secure communications.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a privacy policy and cookie policy to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and data protection inquiries.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Everything to know about the internet guy called 'Bambosh'. The place on the internet where to find the stuff about what Bambosh did.
Key services
Personal information sharing, Links to projects and social media, Donation acceptance
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, Font Awesome 5.15.4, JavaScript (Font Awesome Kit)
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal portfolio/presence site for an individual known as Bambosh.
  2. Content is minimal and mostly links to social media and projects.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers provided on the site.
  5. No forms or data collection mechanisms present.
  6. Uses Font Awesome for icons and is hosted on GitHub Pages.
  7. No security headers or advanced security measures detected.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond Font Awesome kit.
  9. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard HTML5 and CSS with Font Awesome icons loaded via a CDN kit. It is hosted on GitHub Pages, which provides reliable and fast hosting with good uptime and performance. The site is mobile responsive and uses meta viewport tags appropriately. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected, indicating low technical complexity and minimal technical debt. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts suggests minimal data collection and privacy impact. Performance is likely fast due to the lightweight nature of the site. Opportunities exist to modernize by adding accessibility features and SEO enhancements. Technical risks are low but include potential lack of HTTPS enforcement and missing security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bambosh.dev. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bambosh.dev.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.