Skip to main content

Security report for bambidata.com

Bambi Data · Technology · N/A

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bambi Data is a technology company specializing in providing performance dashboards and data integration services tailored for the casino industry. Their cloud-based platform offers automated workflows and visual data insights to help casinos scale their business efficiently. The company positions itself as a cost-effective alternative to building in-house BI teams, targeting casinos and gaming businesses seeking actionable data visualization and automation. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern plugin ecosystem including Yoast SEO and WPBakery Page Builder, hosted on Google Cloud DNS infrastructure. The site uses a valid SSL certificate but lacks modern TLS protocols and comprehensive security headers. Analytics are implemented via Google Tag Manager, indicating moderate user tracking. However, the site lacks explicit privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which impacts compliance and trust. Contact information is clearly provided, including an email and phone number, along with a contact form collecting user details. Overall, the website demonstrates good design and user experience but requires improvements in security posture and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bambidata.com

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
80
Security headers
40
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
85
GDPR outside view
25
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bambi Data operates in the technology sector, focusing on data analytics and business intelligence solutions for casinos. Their business model is subscription-based, offering tiered access to performance dashboards and data integration services. The company leverages partnerships with several casino-related brands, enhancing its market credibility. Their competitive advantage lies in providing ready-made, visually appealing dashboards that save clients time and cost compared to building internal BI capabilities. The target customers are casino operators looking to optimize business performance, automate workflows, and gain faster insights. The presence of trusted partner logos suggests a growing partnership ecosystem. The company appears to be small in size with a focused niche market. Growth indicators include continuous dashboard updates and custom API integrations. The website content and structure support a professional and scalable business operation.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is basic. The SSL certificate is valid and not self-signed, but the server does not support modern TLS versions (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3), which is a significant security gap. Security headers are minimal, with only X-Frame-Options and a permissive Content-Security-Policy allowing all frame ancestors, which could expose the site to clickjacking risks. No HSTS is enabled, and common headers like X-Content-Type-Options or Referrer-Policy are missing. There are no known SSL vulnerabilities such as Heartbleed or POODLE. The site lacks published security policies, incident response information, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, indicating low maturity in security governance and compliance. The contact form collects personal data but there is no visible privacy or cookie policy, raising GDPR compliance concerns. Overall, the security culture appears immature and would benefit from immediate improvements in TLS configuration, security headers, and policy transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable and enforce TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3 protocols on the web server to improve encryption security.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Content-Security-Policy with restrictive frame ancestors.
  3. Publish clear and comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies on the website to enhance compliance and user trust.
  4. Establish and disclose a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact channels to improve security transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly review and update security configurations and conduct security awareness training to foster a stronger security culture.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using a combination of popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search optimization, WPBakery Page Builder for layout design, Ultimate Member for user management, and Contact Form 7 for form handling. The site integrates Tableau embedding for dashboard visualizations and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. Hosting DNS is managed via Google Cloud DNS, indicating reliable infrastructure. Performance is fast with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility. However, the SSL/TLS configuration is outdated, lacking support for modern protocols, which poses a risk. The site uses multiple external resources including fonts and scripts from Google and Tableau. Technical debt is moderate due to outdated TLS and minimal security headers. Modernization opportunities include upgrading TLS, enhancing security headers, and improving compliance documentation to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bambidata.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bambidata.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.