Skip to main content

Security report for baltvia.com

Baltvia LTD · Other · Lithuania

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Baltvia LTD is a small Baltic States-based company specializing in the supply and production of horticulture raw materials such as peat moss, wood fiber, fertilizers, pine bark, and hydroponics products. The company operates from Latvia and Lithuania, with headquarters in Klaipeda, Lithuania, exporting products to over 30 countries worldwide. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and related plugins, presenting a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and product offerings. Technically, the site is moderately optimized with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which should be verified to ensure trust. Overall, the site demonstrates a good business presence but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching baltvia.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Baltvia targets B2B customers in agriculture and horticulture sectors, leveraging Baltic regional resources and optimized logistics to supply quality raw materials globally. Their competitive advantage lies in resource authenticity, expert harvesting, and efficient export capabilities. The business model focuses on raw material supply and production with a clear export orientation. The partnership with grandpeat.com suggests a broader ecosystem in the peat moss and growing media industry. Growth indicators include multi-country exports and a professional digital presence. However, the lack of domain registration transparency and privacy policies may impact credibility with cautious customers.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS ensuring encrypted communication, and contact forms appear secured. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or published security policies, indicating a low maturity in security governance. Privacy compliance is weak with no GDPR or cookie consent mechanisms visible. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a significant concern for trust and legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements in headers, policies, and transparency to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance web security.
  3. Verify domain registration status and update WHOIS records to improve legitimacy and trust.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security governance.
  5. Consider integrating analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to better understand user engagement while maintaining compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Baltvia LTD
Description
Baltvia is a company from the Baltic States specializing in the production and supply of horticulture products and raw materials such as peat moss, wood fiber, fertilizers, pine bark, and hydroponics materials. They operate from Latvia and Lithuania with headquarters in Klaipeda, Lithuania, exporting to over 30 countries worldwide.
Key services
Supply of Baltic peat moss, Horticulture growing media, Fertilizers and micro-elements, Pine bark mulching products, Wood fiber for growing media, Hydroponics clay pebbles
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.5.14, Elementor, Contact Form 7, jQuery, FontAwesome, HT Slider for Elementor
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure contact forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented including emails, phone, address, and contact form.
  4. WHOIS data is missing, raising concerns about domain registration status.
  5. Website uses WordPress with Elementor and common plugins.
  6. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  8. Business appears to be a small Baltic States horticulture raw materials supplier.
  9. No certifications or security policies published on site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Elementor page builder and common plugins like Contact Form 7 and HT Slider. The tech stack includes jQuery and FontAwesome for UI elements. The site loads CSS and JS assets from its own domain and Google Fonts. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators but no major errors detected. Mobile responsiveness is good due to Elementor's responsive design features. SEO is basic with meta tags and canonical links present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags found. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles and alt attributes but no advanced features. Hosting provider is not identified from the data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small business website but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with baltvia.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review baltvia.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.