Skip to main content

Security report for balticvikings.lv

Baltic Vikings · Telecommunications · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Baltic Vikings is a Latvian small business specializing in high-altitude work using alpine methods, founded in 2006. The company offers a range of technical services including telecommunications systems, radio and TV broadcast systems, radar systems, wireless internet, lightning protection, metal constructions, and tree cutting. The website presents a professional image with clear service descriptions, contact information, and partner logos, indicating an established presence in its niche market. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins and integrates Google Analytics and Google Maps for enhanced user experience. However, the absence of HTTPS enforcement and security headers, along with missing privacy and cookie policies, highlight compliance and security gaps. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from improved security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching balticvikings.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Baltic Vikings operates in the telecommunications and related technical services sector, targeting businesses requiring specialized high-altitude work. The company leverages its 15+ years of experience and partnerships with Scandinavian firms to maintain a competitive edge. Its business model focuses on service delivery with a strong emphasis on project completion and client satisfaction. The website's partner and client logos suggest a healthy ecosystem of collaborations. Revenue streams likely derive from contracted technical and construction services. Growth indicators include a multilingual website and detailed service offerings. Strategic observations include the need to enhance digital trust through improved security and compliance measures.

Security posture

The website currently lacks visible security headers and does not enforce HTTPS, which are critical for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. While no obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content, the security posture is moderate and requires improvements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements. The use of common WordPress plugins necessitates regular updates to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  3. Configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Establish an incident response plan and publish contact information for security issues or abuse reports.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and improve security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
“Baltic Vikings” SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Baltic Vikings
Description
SIA Baltic Vikings, founded on April 18, 2006, specializes in work at heights using alpine methods. The company has over 15 years of experience among its leading employees and provides complete project execution including related works. It collaborates with like-minded companies and has experience working with Scandinavian companies.
Key services
Telecommunications systems, Radio and TV broadcast systems, Radar systems, Wireless internet systems, Lightning protection, Metal constructions, Tree cutting, Other related services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Maps API, Revolution Slider plugin, WPML (multilingual plugin), Visual Composer
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
  3. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit, limiting domain trust analysis
  4. Website uses WordPress with common plugins and Google Analytics
  5. Contact information is clearly presented with emails and phone numbers
  6. No security headers detected in provided data
  7. No visible security or incident response policies
  8. Business is small, specialized in high-altitude work using alpine methods
  9. Multiple partner logos and references indicate established local partnerships
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using plugins like Revolution Slider, WPML for multilingual support, and Visual Composer for page building. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Maps APIs for analytics and location services. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile responsiveness. SEO optimization is basic with canonical links and RSS feeds present. Accessibility features are minimal but functional. The technical stack is standard for small business websites but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations to reduce technical debt and improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with balticvikings.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review balticvikings.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.