Skip to main content

Security report for balticum.lt

UAB Balticum TV · Telecommunications · Lithuania

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UAB Balticum TV operates as a telecommunications service provider in Lithuania, offering internet and television services to both residential and business customers. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content focused on fiber optic internet, wireless internet, mobile internet, and smart TV services. The company maintains a moderate market position within the Lithuanian telecommunications sector. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and Tawk.to live chat, built on the Ips Community Suite CMS platform. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well with good SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA on forms, though some security headers are missing and no explicit security policy or incident response information is published. Privacy compliance is strong with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration verification, but the website content and business presence appear legitimate and trustworthy. Overall, the site scores well in content quality, technical implementation, security, privacy compliance, and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching balticum.lt

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Balticum TV targets Lithuanian residential and business customers seeking reliable internet and television services. Their business model centers on providing bundled telecommunications services including fiber optic and wireless internet, digital and smart TV packages. The company leverages partnerships for billing and customer portals, enhancing customer experience. The website indicates a medium-sized enterprise with a consistent brand and professional online presence. Growth indicators include active marketing and promotions visible on the homepage. The company maintains social media channels on Facebook and YouTube, supporting customer engagement. Strategic observations suggest a focus on regional market penetration and service diversification to maintain competitiveness.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced site-wide, and forms are protected with Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate spam and abuse. Cookie consent is implemented in compliance with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap in defense-in-depth. No explicit security policy or incident response contact information is published, which could hinder timely vulnerability reporting and incident management. Third-party scripts for analytics and marketing increase the attack surface and require regular auditing. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved by adopting additional security best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide dedicated incident response contact channels to improve vulnerability reporting and response.
  3. Consider creating and hosting a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure program to foster responsible security communication.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB Balticum TV
Description
Internetas ir televizija namams bei verslui. Patikrinta kokybė ir platus planų pasirinkimas. Žiūrėkite ir naršykite taip, kaip norite!
Key services
Fiber optic internet, Wireless internet, Mobile internet, Smart TV, Digital TV, TV packages
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Tawk.to live chat, jQuery UI, FancyBox, Google reCAPTCHA, Swiper slider
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features
  2. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain registration verification
  3. Good privacy and cookie compliance with visible consent mechanisms
  4. Multiple external tracking and marketing scripts used
  5. Contact information is clearly presented with phone and email
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found
  7. No terms of service page detected
  8. Website uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript libraries
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Ips Community Suite CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and third-party services such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and Tawk.to live chat. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO optimization and moderate performance. The use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms adds a layer of security against automated abuse. However, the site lacks some security headers and detailed technical metadata such as structured data (JSON-LD) or Open Graph tags, which could improve SEO and social sharing. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional user experience but has room for security and performance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with balticum.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review balticum.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.