Skip to main content

Security report for balticpack.lv

SIA Baltic Pack · Manufacturing · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Baltic Pack is a well-established packaging company operating primarily in Latvia and the Baltic region, with over 20 years of experience. It is part of the Baltic Pack Group, which includes entities in Lithuania and Estonia. The company specializes in manufacturing and distributing plastic and paper packaging, packaging equipment, and food industry additives such as spices and aromas. The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using WooCommerce and Elementor, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. It employs Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA for analytics and security respectively. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure, but lacks some security headers and formal privacy and cookie policies. The business information is clearly presented with multiple contact points and physical addresses, enhancing credibility. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and business-focused, but could improve privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching balticpack.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Baltic Pack holds a solid market position as a regional B2B supplier and manufacturer in the packaging and food additives sector. Its competitive advantage lies in its long-standing presence, regional group structure, and comprehensive product and service offerings including packaging production, distribution, and equipment maintenance. The company targets food industry businesses and packaging users in the Baltic states. Revenue streams likely include product sales, equipment servicing, and consulting. The partnership ecosystem includes European manufacturers and related Baltic entities. The website reflects a professional brand with consistent messaging and clear business information, supporting trust and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, indicating gaps in transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which may expose the company to regulatory risks under GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML source. Overall, the security posture is adequate for business operations but could be significantly improved by adopting security best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Create a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Baltic Pack
Registration number
LV40003339189
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Baltic Pack
Description
Baltic Pack is a company specializing in packaging, spices, fragrances, and equipment. It operates as part of the Baltic Pack Group with entities in Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia. The company offers plastic and paper packaging production, printing, distribution, packaging equipment sales and maintenance, and sales of spices and food additives.
Key services
Plastic and paper packaging production and printing, Packaging distribution, Sales and maintenance of production and packaging equipment, Sales of spices, food additives, and aromas
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.4.3, WooCommerce 8.0.1, Slider Revolution 6.6.11, Elementor 3.13.2, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, WordPress Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
WordPress Stats (Jetpack)
Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and structured data.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented in footer with multiple addresses and contacts.
  4. Uses modern WordPress plugins and Google Analytics for tracking.
  5. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.4.3 with WooCommerce 8.0.1 and Elementor 3.13.2, indicating a modern and widely supported CMS and e-commerce platform. It uses Slider Revolution for rich media presentation and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site loads multiple minified CSS and JS assets, suggesting optimization efforts. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin. However, no hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate, with some room for improvement in accessibility and security headers. The technical stack is appropriate for the business size and sector, but ongoing maintenance and security hardening are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with balticpack.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review balticpack.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.