Skip to main content

Security report for balticbridgehr.lv

Baltic Bridge HR · Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Baltic Bridge HR is a Latvian personnel recruitment company specializing in full-cycle personnel selection, assessment, and consulting services. The company emphasizes quality and trust, offering guarantees on their recruitment projects. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting businesses and candidates primarily in Latvia. The company has been active since at least 2011, with a small-sized business profile and a focus on various industries including manufacturing, logistics, finance, and IT. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern libraries and frameworks, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates a compliance gap. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking visible security headers and incident response information. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching balticbridgehr.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Baltic Bridge HR holds a solid position in the Latvian HR recruitment market, leveraging a business model focused on personalized and quality-driven recruitment services. Their client base spans multiple sectors such as trade, logistics, finance, manufacturing, construction, pharmacy, IT, marketing, and unique specialists. The company benefits from a professional website and social media presence, enhancing its market visibility. The partnership with webbuilding.lv for website development suggests a commitment to quality digital presence. Growth indicators include a diverse service portfolio and client references. However, the lack of visible certifications or security policies may limit trust for some clients. The company targets both employers and candidates, positioning itself as a bridge between talent and business needs.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, which is a fundamental security measure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of common WordPress plugins and libraries necessitates regular updates to mitigate risks. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could expose the company to regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers to HTTP responses to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact channel for security issues.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Baltic Bridge HR
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Baltic Bridge HR
Description
Personāla atlases kompānija Baltic Bridge HR. Mēs nodrošinām garantiju katram pilnas atlases projektam, tādejādi rūpējoties par kvalitāti un mūsu klientu drošību.
Key services
Personāla atlase (Personnel recruitment), Personāla novērtēšana (Personnel assessment), Personāla atlases sistēmas audits (Recruitment system audit), Konsultācijas un citi pakalpojumi (Consultations and other services), Personāla lietvedības audits (Personnel record keeping audit)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Swiper.js, Font Awesome, Bootstrap
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Analytics with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and libraries.
  4. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected, which is a compliance gap.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented with email, phone, and physical address.
  6. Social media presence includes Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn.
  7. No visible security headers detected in HTML content; recommend further header analysis.
  8. Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts are present for tracking.
  9. Content is business-focused, professional, and safe for general audiences.
  10. No forms with input fields detected on the homepage HTML provided.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using WPBakery Page Builder, jQuery, Bootstrap, and other modern front-end libraries. It loads Google Fonts and uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and professional design. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML content. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a stable and professional web presence but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with balticbridgehr.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review balticbridgehr.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.