Skip to main content

Security report for baibakov.lv

Zvērinātu advokātu birojs "JB" · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.jblegal.lv represents a Latvian sworn attorney office "JB" specializing in providing legal support primarily to businesses and entrepreneurs. The firm has a long-standing history dating back to 1999, focusing on company registration, tax consultations, commercial law, and everyday legal assistance. The site is professionally designed with clear navigation and contact information, targeting Latvian business clients. Technically, the site uses a moderately modern stack including Bootstrap 3 and jQuery, with good mobile optimization but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS assumed but missing security headers and no visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies. Privacy compliance is limited with a basic privacy policy but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is trustworthy and safe for general audiences but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching baibakov.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

JB Legal operates as a specialized legal service provider in Latvia, focusing on corporate clients and entrepreneurs. Their competitive advantage lies in their long experience and comprehensive legal service offerings including tax disputes, commercial restructuring, and litigation support. The business model is service-based, relying on direct client engagements. The firm maintains a professional online presence with social media integration and clear contact channels. Growth indicators include detailed statistics on client cooperation and case handling. The partnership with Trialine for website development suggests a professional approach to digital presence. However, the absence of advanced marketing or analytics tools indicates a conservative digital strategy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is in use, but no security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS are detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no published security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure program, limiting transparency and preparedness. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. GDPR compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but lacking cookie consent mechanisms. The security culture appears minimal but not negligent. Enhancements in security headers, privacy compliance, and incident response readiness are recommended to improve the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly update and audit third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Zvērinātu advokātu birojs "JB"
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zvērinātu advokātu birojs "JB"
Description
“JB” ir zvērinātu advokātu birojs, kas specializējas juridiskā atbalsta sniegšanā uzņēmumiem un uzņēmējiem. Vadītājs Jurijs Baibakovs darbojas kopš 1999. gada, sniedzot juridisko palīdzību uzņēmumiem, īpaši nodrošinot atbalstu uzņēmumu reģistrācijā, nodokļu jautājumos, komerctiesībās un ikdienas juridiskajā atbalstā.
Key services
Nodokļu konsultācijas un strīdu risināšana, Ikdienas juridiskais atbalsts uzņēmējiem, Komerctiesības, biznesa restrukturizācija, Parādu piedziņa, Darba tiesības, Juridiskā izpēte, Nekustamā īpašuma jautājumi, Pārstāvība tiesās un administratīvajos procesos
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 3, Owl Carousel, Magnific Popup, WOW.js, Typed.js
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage assumed (URL is https)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  3. Website is a professional legal services firm targeting Latvian businesses.
  4. Contact info is clearly presented including phone, email, and physical address.
  5. No cookie consent or detailed privacy policy found, GDPR compliance unclear.
  6. No security.txt or incident response info published.
  7. No visible analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. Modern but somewhat dated tech stack (Bootstrap 3, jQuery).
  9. No visible security headers in HTML source.
  10. Social media presence includes Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a traditional web stack using Bootstrap 3 and jQuery, supplemented by plugins like Owl Carousel and WOW.js for animations. While functional and mobile-optimized, the technology is somewhat dated, potentially limiting performance and maintainability. The site lacks modern CMS indicators and advanced SEO or accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no evident optimizations for speed or accessibility. The hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the HTML content. There is an opportunity to modernize the tech stack, improve SEO metadata, and enhance accessibility compliance to better serve users and improve search engine rankings.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with baibakov.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review baibakov.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.