Bäder und Freizeit GmbH Lutherstadt Wittenberg · Other · Germany
Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.
Bäder und Freizeit GmbH Lutherstadt Wittenberg operates public swimming pools, sauna, and outdoor leisure facilities serving the Lutherstadt Wittenberg community in Germany. The company is part of the Stadtwerke Lutherstadt Wittenberg group, which includes several subsidiaries in utilities and municipal services. Their website provides detailed information on opening hours, pricing, and services, targeting local residents and visitors interested in recreational water activities. Technically, the website is built on the TYPO3 CMS platform, enhanced with accessibility tools such as eyeAble and modern JavaScript libraries like Swiper.js and jQuery. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and uses HTTPS with a cookie consent mechanism that complies with GDPR requirements. Performance is moderate with good SEO and navigation clarity. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses secure cookie settings. However, it lacks explicit security policy documentation and incident response contacts. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data is minimal but consistent with the business's local and municipal nature, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, though it could improve by publishing formal security policies and enhancing security headers. The risk profile is low, with recommendations focusing on strengthening security transparency and incident readiness.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
SSL certificate expires in 6 days
What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention baden-in-wittenberg.de, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for baden-in-wittenberg.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with baden-in-wittenberg.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review baden-in-wittenberg.de.