Skip to main content

Security report for backhausen.com

AMEEA Beteiligungs GmbH · E-commerce · Austria

Partial score · DNS & email only

55/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Backhausen GmbH was a company that ceased operations on June 30, 2023. The website serves primarily as a closure notice and contact point for former customers and stakeholders. It is managed under the parent company AMEEA Beteiligungs GmbH. The site is minimalistic, bilingual (German and English), and lacks active e-commerce or interactive features. Technically, the website is built on Magento with jQuery libraries and served by an Apache server. However, it lacks a valid SSL certificate, resulting in HTTP-only access, which significantly impacts security posture. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no security headers beyond basic HTTP headers are implemented. Contact information is limited to two company email addresses related to brand and archive inquiries. Overall, the site is informational with basic technical implementation and poor security and privacy compliance.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching backhausen.com

This scan found 5 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
85
Average
55

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business was positioned in the e-commerce sector, likely related to textile or manufacturing given the Backhausen brand history. The closure announcement indicates the company is no longer operational, with AMEEA Beteiligungs GmbH as the parent entity. The website targets former customers and stakeholders, providing contact emails for brand and archive questions. There is no evidence of ongoing commercial activity or digital marketing efforts. The domain registration is consistent with the business identity, and DNS records point to related domains. The lack of active services or updated content suggests the business is in wind-down or archival phase.

Security posture

The website's security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS and a valid SSL certificate, exposing users to potential interception risks. No advanced security headers are present, and no incident response or security policy information is provided. The site does not implement cookie consent or privacy policies, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No forms or input fields are present, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. The lack of security best practices and outdated technical stack components (e.g., Magento without updates) may pose risks if the site were to be reactivated. Overall, the security maturity is low, and immediate improvements are recommended to protect user data and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and install a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and protect user connections.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy to harden the site.
  4. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Review and update the Magento platform and associated libraries to the latest secure versions or consider decommissioning if no longer in use.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on an Apache server and uses Magento CMS with jQuery and related JavaScript libraries. The site is served over HTTP without SSL, which is a critical technical deficiency. Performance metrics are unavailable or zero, indicating no active monitoring or optimization. The site uses multiple CSS stylesheets and JavaScript files but lacks modern performance enhancements such as caching or compression indicators. Mobile optimization is basic, and accessibility features are minimal. SEO metadata is present but limited to basic meta tags without Open Graph or structured data. The DNS setup is standard with multiple authoritative name servers and a single A record. No DNSSEC or CAA records are configured, which could improve DNS security. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but outdated and insecure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with backhausen.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review backhausen.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.