Skip to main content

Security report for babygalerie24.de

Other · Germany

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

31/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website babygalerie24.de appears to be a simple, small-scale platform focused on baby photo galleries, targeting German-speaking parents or families. The site content is minimal and lacks detailed business descriptions, contact information, or interactive features. Technically, the site uses legacy jQuery libraries and basic CSS styling without modern frameworks or CMS indications. Mobile optimization and accessibility are poor, and no advanced SEO or analytics tools are detected. Security posture is weak with no visible HTTPS enforcement or security headers, and no cookie consent mechanisms are present. The WHOIS data shows an active domain with standard nameservers but lacks registrant details, limiting trust assessment. Overall, the site is functional but basic, with significant room for improvement in content richness, security, and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching babygalerie24.de

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
28
Average
31

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention babygalerie24.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for babygalerie24.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind babygalerie24.de operates in a niche related to baby photo galleries, likely providing a service or platform for families to view or share baby photos. Market positioning and competitive advantages are unclear due to lack of detailed content. The business model appears to be content or service-based without visible monetization or partnership information. The target audience is parents or families in Germany. There is no evidence of growth indicators, partnerships, or certifications. The lack of contact details and business transparency may hinder credibility and customer trust.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is low. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is provided. The absence of cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the limited content, but the overall security posture is weak and requires significant improvements to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS across the entire website to secure data transmission.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Develop and display a comprehensive cookie policy with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  4. Provide clear contact information including email and phone to improve business credibility and support.
  5. Enhance website content quality, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility to improve user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website appears to be related to baby galleries or baby photo services, targeting German-speaking users. No explicit business description found in content.
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery Autocomplete, jQuery Lightbox
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal with no visible business contact information.
  2. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected in HTML.
  3. No social media links or email addresses found.
  4. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  5. Website uses legacy jQuery libraries and basic CSS styling.
  6. No cookie consent or terms of service pages detected.
  7. WHOIS data is minimal but domain is active with standard nameservers.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  9. Website appears to be a simple informational site with limited content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy jQuery libraries for frontend functionality and basic CSS for styling. There is no indication of a modern CMS or framework. Performance is moderate but mobile optimization is poor, with no responsive design detected. SEO optimization is minimal with basic meta tags but no structured data or Open Graph tags. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating limited data collection. The hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the content. Technical debt is evident due to outdated libraries and lack of modern web practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with babygalerie24.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review babygalerie24.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.