Skip to main content

Security report for b2match.com

b2match · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

b2match is a technology-driven SaaS company specializing in event management platforms focused on networking and matchmaking for in-person, virtual, and hybrid events. The platform offers a comprehensive suite of tools including registration, ticketing, agenda management, AI-powered matchmaking, mobile apps, and analytics, positioning itself as a trusted solution for event professionals globally. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with modern technologies such as Next.js, React, and integration of major analytics and advertising platforms. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly available. Overall, the website and business exhibit high professionalism and trustworthiness, though WHOIS data is privacy-protected, which is common for SaaS providers. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header implementation and publishing security policies to further improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching b2match.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

b2match operates in the event technology sector, targeting event organizers and professionals seeking efficient networking and matchmaking solutions. The business model is SaaS-based, offering customizable event management tools with value-added features like AI matchmaking and mobile apps. The company has established a strong market position evidenced by partnerships with reputable organizations such as the European Commission and CERN. The platform supports diverse event types and use cases, including innovation partnering, startup-investor connections, and trade shows. The website content and client testimonials reinforce the company's credibility and customer satisfaction. Growth indicators include a large number of events organized and participants engaged over 12 years. The partnership ecosystem includes integrations and related service domains enhancing the platform's capabilities.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration, uses cookie consent banners aligned with GDPR, and integrates tracking and analytics tools responsibly. Security headers are partially implemented but could be improved by explicitly adding X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options headers. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. The lack of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure program suggests room for maturity in security communication. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced policy visibility and header hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate clickjacking and MIME sniffing risks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security posture.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure no vulnerable or deprecated libraries are used.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user rights in the privacy policy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
b2match
Description
b2match provides an event management platform focused on networking, enabling organizers to host in-person, virtual, and hybrid networking events and communities with ease. The platform emphasizes meaningful partnerships through matchmaking and offers tools for registration, agenda, ticketing, meeting management, communications, analytics, and more.
Key services
Event registration and ticketing, Agenda and session management, B2B meeting and matchmaking management, Mobile event networking app, AI-powered matchmaking, Email marketing and communications, Reporting and analytics, Customer support
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Bing UET, Bing Ads, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JavaScript frameworks

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Bing UET
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via GTM), Microsoft Clarity, Bing UET
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking.
  2. Strong focus on event management and networking solutions.
  3. Multiple client testimonials and reputable client logos enhance trust.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response contact found.
  7. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React-based framework (Next.js) ensuring server-side rendering and good SEO performance. It uses multiple analytics and advertising scripts including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Bing UET, indicating a mature marketing and analytics setup. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with preloaded fonts and responsive images. Performance is fast with asynchronous script loading and CDN usage for static assets. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless CMS approach. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a scalable, performant, and user-friendly platform suitable for enterprise-grade event management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 77/100Low28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with b2match.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review b2match.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.