Skip to main content

Security report for azgals.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AZ Gals is a niche adult entertainment website offering free high-resolution erotic and pornographic image galleries categorized and searchable for adult users. The site has been operational since 2006, indicating a stable presence in the adult content market. It targets adults-only audiences with explicit content and daily updates, positioning itself as a free resource in the adult entertainment niche. Technically, the site uses older JavaScript libraries and Cloudflare DNS services but lacks modern security enhancements such as DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, which is a significant gap given the nature of the content and potential regulatory requirements. The site includes an abuse contact email but lacks broader contact or business information. Overall, the site is functional but shows areas for improvement in security and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching azgals.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates on a free content model, providing extensive adult galleries with a wide range of categories, appealing to diverse adult preferences. It leverages partnerships or affiliate links to other adult sites, such as vipwank.com, to supplement content offerings. The business model likely relies on advertising revenue, as indicated by embedded ad iframes. The site’s market position is that of a specialized adult content provider with a long operational history but limited transparency in business details. Growth indicators are not evident from the data, and the site lacks modern marketing or analytics tools. The partnership ecosystem includes multiple linked adult sites, suggesting a networked approach to content distribution.

Security posture

The security posture is basic with some weaknesses. The domain is protected against unauthorized transfers but lacks DNSSEC, which could expose DNS spoofing risks. No security headers are present in the HTML content, and there is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or advanced TLS configurations from the data provided. The site uses an older jQuery version, which may have known vulnerabilities if not patched. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Incident response is partially addressed via an abuse email contact. Overall, the site should prioritize implementing security headers, enabling DNSSEC, updating libraries, and adding privacy compliance measures to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other privacy laws.
  4. Upgrade JavaScript libraries to current versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  5. Ensure HTTPS is enforced site-wide with strong TLS configurations.
  6. Expand contact information to include general support or business emails to improve trust.
  7. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  8. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility to enhance user experience.
  9. Audit and document data retention policies and user tracking practices for transparency.
  10. Increase advertising transparency by disclosing ad networks and tracking mechanisms.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
100% free high resolution erotic and sex pictures. Categorized and searchable galleries archive. Daily updated free porn!
Key services
free erotic and pornographic image galleries, searchable categorized content, daily content updates
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.0, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
rmhfrtnd.com
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a free adult content gallery with extensive categories and daily updates.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating poor compliance with privacy regulations.
  3. Contact information limited to an abuse email address; no general support or business contact emails found.
  4. No visible security headers or advanced security measures detected in HTML content.
  5. Site uses Cloudflare DNS but no DNSSEC enabled.
  6. Multiple external adult content related domains linked as free sites.
  7. Advertising is present via embedded iframes from rmhfrtnd.com ad network.
  8. Site content is accessible with no WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  9. Site uses older jQuery version (1.11.0), indicating some technical debt.
  10. No social media or phone contact information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a basic tech stack with jQuery 1.11.0 and Cloudflare DNS services. There is no detected CMS or modern web framework. The site relies on static HTML with embedded JavaScript for functionality. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is basic with meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. The site embeds advertisements via iframes from rmhfrtnd.com, indicating third-party ad network usage. Technical debt is evident from the use of outdated libraries and lack of modern security practices. Opportunities exist to modernize the stack, improve performance, and enhance security configurations to better support business operations and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with azgals.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review azgals.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.