Skip to main content

Security report for axinom.com

Axinom · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Axinom is a technology company specializing in digital platform solutions for video streaming, OTT, content management, and in-flight entertainment systems. The company targets enterprises in aerospace and media sectors, offering modular, scalable, and customizable products to empower content-first platforms. Their market position is supported by a professional website, notable client logos, and active social media presence. Technically, the website employs modern technologies including Shaka Player, Google Tag Manager, and CookieYes for consent management, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, anti-forgery protections, and bot mitigation, though there is room for improvement in security headers and incident response transparency. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, warranting monitoring. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and compliant, supporting Axinom's credibility as a technology provider.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of axinom.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching axinom.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Axinom operates in the technology sector, focusing on transportation (aerospace) and media industries. Their business model is B2B, providing software and platform solutions that address content management, streaming, and digital cabin systems. The company demonstrates strong market positioning through partnerships and client endorsements. Revenue streams likely include licensing, subscriptions, and professional services. The target customer segments are enterprises requiring advanced digital content solutions. Growth indicators include active content updates, webinars, and press releases. The partnership ecosystem includes the Axinom Portal and integrations with major platforms. Strategic observations highlight a focus on innovation, modularity, and scalability to meet evolving industry needs.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent with granular controls, and anti-forgery tokens. Use of Google reCAPTCHA indicates bot protection measures. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a published security.txt file limit transparency and incident response readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies. Incident response contact information is not publicly available, which could delay handling of security incidents. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized vulnerability disclosure processes.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve incident response.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen defense-in-depth.
  3. Provide explicit incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses on the website.
  4. Clarify and publish data retention policies related to analytics and cookies to enhance privacy transparency.
  5. Monitor and resolve the absence of WHOIS domain registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Axinom
Description
Axinom solves technological challenges in video streaming, OTT, content management, protection, monetization, digital on-board systems, and more. They empower customers with best-of-breed products for content-first platforms.
Key services
In-Flight Entertainment, Digital Cabins, Video Streaming, Content Management, Content Protection
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Shaka Player, jQuery, Fancybox, Socket.io, Google Tag Manager, CookieYes Consent, Calendly Widget, Algolia Search, InstantSearch.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with customization
  • Anti-forgery cookies
  • Bot protection via Google reCAPTCHA

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
doubleclick.net
Marketing tools
Calendly, Algolia
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed cookie categories
  3. Privacy policy is present and GDPR compliant
  4. No explicit terms of service found
  5. Contact information includes email and phone with clear context
  6. Social media presence is strong across multiple platforms
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  8. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and warrants attention
  9. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  10. No WAF or blocking detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Shaka Player for video playback, jQuery, Fancybox, Socket.io, and Algolia for search functionality. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for tracking and analytics. CookieYes manages cookie consent with detailed categorization and user controls. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility and SEO optimization. Performance is moderate, with deferred loading of scripts and preloading of key assets. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence, though opportunities exist to enhance security headers and incident response mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with axinom.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review axinom.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.