Skip to main content

Security report for axigen.com

Axigen · Telecommunications · Eu

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Axigen operates as a premium mail server software provider targeting telecommunications service providers, managed service providers, and businesses. Their platform offers scalable, secure, and customizable email hosting solutions with a strong emphasis on extensibility and digital sovereignty. The website reflects a mature business with over 15 years of experience, offering white-label solutions and cloud-native deployment options. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools, indicating a digitally mature infrastructure. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and published incident response policies. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration transparency, though the professional website content and trust indicators mitigate some risk. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional business presence with room for improvement in security disclosures and contact transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching axigen.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
70
Email security
82
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Axigen positions itself strongly in the telecommunications and managed services market segments, leveraging a software licensing and support business model. Their key competitive advantages include a customizable and extensible mail server platform, cloud-native deployment, and a developer-led support team. The company targets medium to large service providers and businesses requiring robust email hosting solutions. The presence of customer testimonials and known telecom clients supports credibility. Marketing efforts utilize social media and advanced tracking tools, indicating a focus on customer acquisition and retention. The lack of visible contact details on the main page suggests a preference for controlled lead generation via forms or partner channels. The company’s ecosystem includes partnerships but no publicly listed subsidiaries or parent companies.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA for form security, demonstrating baseline security hygiene. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No explicit security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published, which could hinder rapid incident handling and reduce transparency. The use of multiple third-party scripts (Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Intercom, Autopilot) introduces potential privacy and security risks if not properly managed. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. The WHOIS data absence is a notable risk factor for domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with better transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  2. Add security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Enhance HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear and accessible contact information for sales, support, and security incidents to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit and minimize third-party scripts to reduce privacy risks and improve site performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Axigen
Description
Reliable, secure, extensible, and customizable mail server software platform made for on-prem and cloud-native deployment; easily scalable, smart licensing.
Key services
Mail server software, Email hosting solutions, White-label email hosting, Support and customization, Cloud-native deployment
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, Intercom, Autopilot, WebAdmin, WebMail
Platforms
Windows, Linux, Cloud-native, Kubernetes
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • Cookie consent banner present
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Pixel
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Intercom, Autopilot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WAF or security challenge detected
  3. WHOIS data unavailable or not provided by VeriSign WHOIS server
  4. Strong business focus on mail server software for service providers and businesses
  5. Good privacy and cookie policy presence with consent mechanism
  6. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on main page
  7. Multiple social media profiles linked (Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn)
  8. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools
  9. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page
  10. No explicit security policy or incident response information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery 3.6.0 and integrates multiple marketing and analytics platforms such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, Intercom, and Autopilot. The site supports responsive design with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The platform supports Windows, Linux, and cloud-native deployments including Kubernetes, reflecting a versatile technical infrastructure. Performance is fast with optimized assets and caching. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary content management approach. The lack of explicit hosting provider information limits infrastructure transparency. Overall, the technical implementation is robust and modern, supporting the business’s scalability and extensibility claims.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with axigen.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review axigen.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.