Skip to main content

Security report for avrar.cz

Asociace virtuální a rozšířené reality · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website avrar.cz represents the Asociace virtuální a rozšířené reality, a Czech association focused on virtual and augmented reality technologies. It serves as a community hub for professionals, entrepreneurs, institutions, academics, and enthusiasts in the VR/AR sector. The association organizes the Czech VR Fest, the largest industry festival and conference in Central Europe, positioning itself as a leading entity in this niche market. The site provides information about membership, events, and news related to VR/AR innovation in the Czech Republic. Technically, the website uses modern JavaScript frameworks (Vue.js), integrates social media SDKs, and employs Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for tracking. Hosting is provided by WEDOS, a reputable Czech hosting provider. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling, but lacks visible security headers and public security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies and no explicit consent mechanisms. Contact information is limited to web forms without direct email or phone contacts. Overall, the site is professional, well-branded, and trustworthy, but could improve transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching avrar.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The association operates as a non-profit entity in the technology sector, specifically targeting the VR and AR community in the Czech Republic and Central Europe. Its business model revolves around community building, event organization, and providing membership benefits. The website indicates a small-sized organization founded in 2017, with a clear market position as a leading VR/AR association in the region. The presence of social media links and event promotion suggests active engagement with its audience. The partnership with Czech VR Fest enhances its visibility and influence. Revenue streams likely include membership fees and event sponsorships. The organization demonstrates consistent branding and professional content, supporting its credibility and growth potential within its niche.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure POST methods with CSRF tokens for form submissions, indicating a baseline security awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No public security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The use of third-party tracking scripts (Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics) without visible consent mechanisms raises privacy concerns under GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced policies, headers, and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner to obtain user consent for tracking.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure information on the website.
  5. Include contact details for a Data Protection Officer or privacy contact.
  6. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity.
  7. Regularly audit third-party scripts for privacy and security compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Asociace virtuální a rozšířené reality
Description
Tvoří komunitu virtuální a rozšířené reality, sdružuje odborníky, podnikatele, instituce, akademiky i nadšence a pomáhá VR a AR inovacím. Pořádá Czech VR Fest, největší oborový festival a konferenci ve střední Evropě.
Key services
Budování komunity VR a AR, Pořádání Czech VR Fest, Podpora inovací v oboru, Členství s výhodami
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js (implied by VueInit JSON), Facebook SDK, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Twitter widgets
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics with async loading
  • Forms use POST method with CSRF tokens

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK, Twitter widgets
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  3. Contact information is only via forms; no direct emails or phone numbers provided.
  4. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools without explicit user consent mechanisms.
  5. Good branding and consistent messaging focused on VR/AR community.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; potential area for improvement.
  7. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  8. No security or incident response policies publicly disclosed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Vue.js, and integrates multiple third-party SDKs for social media and analytics. Hosting is managed by WEDOS, a known Czech provider, ensuring reliable infrastructure. The site loads scripts asynchronously to optimize performance, and the design is responsive for mobile devices. SEO is supported by canonical links and meta viewport tags. However, no CMS signatures were detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. The absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but has room for modernization in security and privacy implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with avrar.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review avrar.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.