Skip to main content

Security report for aviko.com

Aviko · Manufacturing · N/a

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aviko is a well-established company specializing in the manufacturing and distribution of potato-based food products, including fries, with a strong focus on sustainability, quality, and innovation. The company targets multiple audiences including consumers, foodservice professionals, growers, and industry partners, positioning itself as a global player in its sector. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and comprehensive content that supports its business objectives. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies such as React and Next.js, integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics, and uses Cookiebot for cookie consent management, indicating a good level of digital maturity. Performance and mobile optimization are good, with accessibility and SEO features well implemented. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data for the subdomain is unavailable, which is typical and not suspicious, as the main domain is presumably registered properly. Overall, the website presents a low risk profile with strong business credibility and good privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and providing explicit incident response contacts to further strengthen trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aviko.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Aviko operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on potato-based food products with a global market reach. Its business model integrates sustainability and innovation as key differentiators. The company maintains strong engagement with diverse target groups, including consumers, foodservice, growers, and industry professionals, indicating a broad and integrated market approach. The parent company is Royal Cosun, suggesting a solid corporate backing. The website content and structure reflect a mature and professional organization with clear branding and trust signals such as sustainability reports and social media presence. The company appears to be large in size with a well-established market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, it lacks several security best practices such as security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, etc.), published security policies, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The absence of explicit security contact channels and security.txt file indicates room for improvement in incident response readiness and transparency. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but could be enhanced to meet higher compliance and trust standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response page on the website.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Provide explicit security contact channels for reporting incidents or abuse.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to avoid vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aviko
Description
Aviko is a company focused on producing and delivering potato-based food products, including fries and related items. They emphasize sustainability, quality, innovation, and connection with various target groups such as consumers, foodservice professionals, growers, and industry professionals.
Key services
Potato product manufacturing, Sustainability reporting, Consumer engagement, Foodservice solutions, Grower partnerships, Industry collaboration, Talent acquisition
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Tag Manager, YouTube iframe API, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and professionally presented.
  3. Strong emphasis on sustainability and corporate responsibility.
  4. No direct email addresses or phone numbers found; contact via contact page.
  5. Social media presence on LinkedIn and YouTube confirmed.
  6. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and accessible.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. WHOIS data for subdomain not available, which is typical.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, which support server-side rendering and good SEO performance. Integration with Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot indicates a mature approach to analytics and privacy compliance. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with preloading of critical CSS and images. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, but the use of AWS S3 for media assets is noted. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence with opportunities to improve security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aviko.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aviko.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.