Skip to main content

Security report for av-tarife.de

Other · Germany

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website av-tarife.de is currently inaccessible, returning a 403 Forbidden error page that denies access to all users. This prevents any direct analysis of the site's content, metadata, or business information. The domain is hosted on Schlund Technologies' nameservers, a German hosting provider, which aligns with the domain's German country code top-level domain (ccTLD). Due to the lack of accessible content, no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are available, and no contact or business details can be extracted. The site does not display any scripts, analytics, or advertising technologies, indicating minimal or no public-facing content at this time. From a technical perspective, the site appears to be blocked or restricted, possibly due to server configuration or access control policies. No specific web application firewall (WAF) vendor challenge was detected, but the generic 403 error suggests intentional access denial. Security headers and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data, limiting the security posture assessment. The WHOIS data shows consistent domain registration with no privacy protection, hosted by a reputable German provider, supporting legitimacy but not providing further business insights. Overall, the security posture cannot be fully assessed due to the lack of accessible content. The site currently scores very low on content quality, technical implementation, security, privacy compliance, and business credibility. There are no indications of adult or questionable content, and the site is rated safe in terms of content safety. Strategic recommendations include resolving access issues to enable content availability, implementing security best practices, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing clear contact information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching av-tarife.de

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
25
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the inaccessible nature of the website, no direct business intelligence data such as company name, services, market positioning, or business model could be extracted. The domain's German ccTLD and hosting provider suggest a business operating in Germany, potentially in a small business category. Without accessible content or metadata, insights into revenue streams, target customers, or partnerships are unavailable. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, indicating a genuine business intent, but further investigation would require access to the live site or additional data sources.

Security posture

The current security posture assessment is limited by the lack of accessible website content. The site returns a 403 Forbidden error, which may indicate restrictive server settings or access control measures. No security headers or SSL configuration details were provided, and no forms or input fields are present to evaluate for secure handling. There is no evidence of privacy policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The domain registration is consistent and hosted by a known provider, which is a positive indicator. Overall, the security maturity appears low due to lack of visible security practices and policies, but no explicit vulnerabilities or exposures were detected from the available data.

Recommendations

  1. Resolve the 403 Forbidden error to allow public access to the website content.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  3. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  4. Configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security posture.
  5. Conduct a full security audit once the site is accessible to identify and remediate any vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Website returns a 403 Forbidden error page indicating access is denied. No WAF vendor-specific challenge detected but content is blocked. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to 403 Forbidden error.
  2. No metadata, scripts, forms, or external links found in HTML content.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected.
  4. No contact information or business details available on the page.
  5. Nameservers indicate hosting by Schlund Technologies in Germany.
  6. No security headers or SSL configuration details available from provided data.
  7. No analytics, advertising, or tracking technologies detected.
  8. Website appears to be blocked or restricted, limiting analysis.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
  10. WHOIS data consistent with legitimate domain registration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Schlund Technologies' infrastructure, as indicated by the nameservers. The HTML content is minimal and only contains a standard 403 Forbidden error page with no metadata, scripts, or external resources. No CMS or frameworks are detectable from the provided data. The lack of accessible content prevents evaluation of performance, mobile optimization, accessibility, or SEO. The site currently exhibits technical debt in the form of inaccessible content and missing standard web features. Modernization opportunities include enabling HTTPS if not already enabled, improving error handling, and deploying a content management system to facilitate content delivery.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with av-tarife.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review av-tarife.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.