Skip to main content

Security report for auva.at

Allgemeine Unfallversicherungsanstalt (AUVA) · Government · Austria

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Allgemeine Unfallversicherungsanstalt (AUVA) is an Austrian government agency providing accident insurance services including prevention, medical treatment, rehabilitation, and financial compensation. The website auva.at serves as the official portal for these services, targeting Austrian residents and workers. The site is professionally designed with consistent branding and uses modern web technologies such as Vue.js and Umbraco CMS. It includes a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR requirements. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security headers and incident response information are absent. Overall, the website is trustworthy and well-positioned as a national government service provider.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of auva.at. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching auva.at

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention auva.at, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
90
Employees
0
Customers
89
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
42%

6 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for auva.at.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AUVA operates as a public accident insurance provider within the Austrian government sector. Its business model focuses on statutory accident insurance and rehabilitation services. The website reflects a large, established entity with a clear market position as a government agency. Key services include accident prevention, medical care, rehabilitation, and compensation. The target audience is primarily Austrian workers and residents. The site integrates with partner domains such as sozialversicherung.at, indicating a connected social insurance ecosystem. The lack of visible contact details on the homepage suggests contact information may be located deeper within the site or handled via other channels.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent banner that supports user privacy choices. No security headers were detected in the provided content, which is a potential area for improvement. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and readiness perception. The use of Piwik (Matomo) analytics indicates moderate user tracking balanced with privacy compliance. Overall, the site is secure but could enhance its security communication and controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Provide clear privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the homepage.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance SEO by including structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and contact information.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Allgemeine Unfallversicherungsanstalt (AUVA)
Description
Startseite der Allgemeinen Unfallversicherungsanstalt (AUVA) - Prävention, Unfallheilbehandlung, Rehabilitation und finanzielle Entschädigung.
Key services
Accident prevention, Accident medical treatment, Rehabilitation, Financial compensation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js, CSS, Piwik (Matomo) analytics, Truendo cookie consent
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik (Matomo)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Piwik (Matomo)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official Austrian government accident insurance website
  2. Uses modern web technologies and frameworks
  3. Implements cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage HTML
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in provided content
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  7. Good SSL configuration and no WAF blocking detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Vue.js for frontend interactivity and Umbraco CMS for content management. CSS and JavaScript assets are well organized with versioning for cache control. The site loads Piwik (Matomo) analytics for user tracking and uses a third-party Truendo script for cookie consent management. The site appears mobile optimized and accessible with skip links and focus-visible classes. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected in the provided content. Hosting provider details were not explicitly found.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 72/100 +21Medium27 findingsView report
  2. 51/100Medium24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with auva.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review auva.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.