Skip to main content

Security report for aurika.lt

Aurika · Manufacturing · Lithuania

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aurika is a Lithuanian-based manufacturing company specializing in the production of labels and flexible packaging solutions. Positioned as a leading printing house in the Baltic countries, Aurika offers a range of products including adhesive labels, wrapping labels, IML labels, flexible packaging, and caps. The company targets businesses in food, beverage, cosmetics, and chemical industries, emphasizing quality, sustainability, and customization. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with comprehensive content and multiple industry certifications that enhance trust and credibility. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and integrates modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and moderate performance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and privacy compliance mechanisms in place, including cookie consent and privacy policies. However, some security headers and explicit security policies are missing, which could be improved. Overall, Aurika demonstrates a mature digital presence with strong business credibility and a good security baseline. The absence of a public security policy and incident response contacts suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, allowing full content accessibility and analysis. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy and incident response information, adding vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, and improving accessibility features to further strengthen compliance and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aurika.lt

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Aurika operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on labels and flexible packaging. The company leverages certifications such as ISO 9001, ISCC Plus, HALAL, FSC, SEDEX, ECOVADIS, and BRC to establish market trust and compliance. Their business model is B2B manufacturing with a focus on quality, sustainability, and customization. The website targets industries including food products, beverages (both alcoholic and non-alcoholic), cosmetics, and household/automotive care. Aurika maintains partnerships with platforms like web4labels.com for self-service and etikete.lt for e-commerce, indicating a diversified channel strategy. The company is relatively new, founded in 2022, and positions itself as a leading Baltic printing house, suggesting growth ambitions and regional market leadership.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts with privacy considerations. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented, indicating GDPR awareness. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security hardening. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact channels limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, which is a missed opportunity for responsible vulnerability management. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with additional headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate risks from vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aurika
Description
Gaminame etiketes ir lanksčias pakuotes. Greitas pristatymas. Aukštos kokybės etikečių gamyba. Individuali gamyba pagal poreikius.
Key services
Flexible packaging production, Adhesive labels, Wrapping labels, IML labels, Caps production
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, HubSpot, jQuery, Swiper.js, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security-related consent settings in Google Analytics
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive and relevant to manufacturing of labels and flexible packaging.
  3. Multiple industry certifications enhance trust.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with consent mechanisms.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  6. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools with privacy considerations.
  7. No WAF or blocking detected; full content accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with integration of modern JavaScript libraries and marketing tools such as Swiper.js for UI components, Google Tag Manager for tag management, and HubSpot for marketing automation. The site uses jQuery and includes multiple analytics and tracking scripts from Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, and HubSpot. Performance is moderate with some lazy loading of images, although some images show loading errors which could impact user experience. SEO is well addressed with Yoast SEO plugin and proper meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Mobile optimization is good, and navigation is clear and consistent. Hosting and domain registration are managed by Telia Lietuva, AB, a reputable provider in Lithuania. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and adequate for the business needs, with opportunities to improve performance and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aurika.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aurika.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.