Skip to main content

Security report for aurianagency.lv

admin · Other · Latvia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aurian agency is a Latvian-based digital marketing and design agency specializing in website development, SEO optimization, social media marketing, and visual identity creation. The company positions itself as a professional service provider helping businesses grow and acquire more clients. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and several plugins to enhance user experience and functionality. The technical infrastructure is modern and includes security features such as HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, although some security headers are missing. Privacy and cookie policies are not present, indicating a gap in compliance. Overall, the website is accessible, well-structured, and targets local Latvian businesses seeking digital marketing and design services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aurianagency.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
25
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Aurian agency operates as a small service provider in the digital marketing and design sector, focusing on Latvian businesses. Their business model revolves around offering comprehensive digital services including website creation, SEO, and branding. The company appears to have been founded in 2021, consistent with domain registration data. The website content and structured data reflect a consistent brand identity. The agency leverages popular web technologies and marketing tools, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. No explicit partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The absence of visible contact details on the homepage may limit direct customer engagement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, which are positive security practices. However, the absence of common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of publicly available security policies or incident response information suggests limited transparency in security governance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved by implementing additional headers and publishing security-related policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish security and incident response policies to increase transparency and trust.
  4. Include clear and accessible contact information such as company emails and phone numbers on the website.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
admin
Description
Aurian agency piedāvā profesionālus digitālās reklāmas pakalpojumus, tostarp mājaslapu izstrādi, SEO optimizāciju, sociālo mediju mārketingu, logo un vizuālās identitātes izstrādi. Mēs palīdzēsim Jūsu biznesam augt un iegūt vairāk klientu!
Key services
Mājaslapu izstrāde, Digitālā reklāma, SEO optimizācija, Sociālo mediju mārketings, Logo un vizuālās identitātes izstrāde
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, GSAP, Swiper, Google reCAPTCHA, Bootstrap
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional digital marketing and design agency based in Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting local businesses.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage HTML.
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and several plugins for enhanced UI and functionality.
  5. Security features include HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA on forms.
  6. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in the provided HTML content.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. SEO optimized with meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) present.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in the HTML content.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, GSAP, and Swiper for interactive UI elements. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for tracking and analytics. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain and trusted external sources. Performance appears moderate with lazy loading implemented for images. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO is supported by meta tags and structured data. However, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. The technical stack is standard for a professional agency website but requires improvements in security headers and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aurianagency.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aurianagency.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.