Skip to main content

Security report for auoirs.net

Agencija za upravljanje oduzetom imovinom Republike Srpske · Government · Bosnia and Herzegovina

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents the Agencija za upravljanje oduzetom imovinom Republike Srpske, a government agency under the Ministry of Justice of Republika Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina. The agency manages assets confiscated through criminal proceedings, as established by law. The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity with good SEO practices but lacking advanced security configurations such as DNSSEC and security headers. The site is accessible via HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, but lacks visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links were found, limiting direct communication channels. Overall, the site is professional and consistent with a government entity but could improve in privacy compliance and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching auoirs.net

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
95
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency operates in the government sector, focusing on asset management related to confiscated property. Its market position is that of an essential governmental body with a clear mandate. The business model is service-oriented, providing administrative management of assets. The target audience includes citizens, legal entities, and other government bodies within Republika Srpska. The website content is primarily in Serbian, targeting local users. The domain age and registration details align with the agency's founding date, supporting legitimacy. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. The lack of contact information and privacy policies may limit user engagement and trust.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communication. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing attacks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy, which reduces transparency for security researchers. The domain status clientTransferProhibited is a positive indicator against unauthorized domain transfers. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be significantly improved by implementing recommended security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  5. Provide clear contact information including official emails and phone numbers to improve communication and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Agencija za upravljanje oduzetom imovinom Republike Srpske
Description
Agencija za upravljanje oduzetom imovinom, kao upravna organizacija u sastavu Ministarstva pravde Republike Srpske osnovana je Zakonom o oduzimanju imovine stečene izvršenjem krivičnog djela.
Key services
management of confiscated assets
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Yoast SEO, Google Fonts
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government agency site for asset management in Republika Srpska.
  2. Content is primarily in Serbian language with Cyrillic and Latin scripts.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or linked pages.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML content.
  5. No social media links detected in the header or footer areas.
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with Divi theme and Yoast SEO plugin.
  7. No visible forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity.
  10. SSL is enabled and site uses HTTPS.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Divi theme and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and widely supported technology stack. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site is hosted on servers using name servers from lanaco.com, a known hosting provider. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but could benefit from optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, supported by Divi's responsive design features. Accessibility is basic, with no advanced ARIA or accessibility features detected. SEO is good due to Yoast SEO plugin usage and proper meta tags. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could impact security and trustworthiness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with auoirs.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review auoirs.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.