Skip to main content

Security report for aumento.dk

Aumento Law firm · Other · Denmark

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aumento Law firm is a modern legal services provider based in Copenhagen, Denmark, offering a broad range of legal expertise through a team of over 50 attorneys and 25 practice areas. The firm targets businesses and individuals seeking professional legal advice and representation. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, with comprehensive contact information and a clear presentation of their services. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern web technologies such as Cookiebot for cookie consent management and Hotjar for analytics, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, employs standard security headers, and provides a granular cookie consent mechanism, demonstrating good compliance with privacy regulations like GDPR. However, the absence of explicit terms of service and security policy pages suggests areas for improvement in transparency and compliance documentation. Overall, the domain WHOIS data is privacy-protected, which is typical for professional firms, and no suspicious indicators were found, supporting the legitimacy of the business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 18 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aumento.dk

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm holds a solid market position as a medium-sized law office with a diverse portfolio of legal practice areas. Their business model revolves around providing specialized legal services through a partnership structure. The website's content and structure indicate a focus on client engagement and transparency, with detailed attorney profiles and contact options. The use of advanced web technologies and compliance tools suggests a forward-looking approach to digital presence and client data protection. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content or linked domains, indicating an independent operation. The firm appears to maintain a professional and trustworthy reputation within the Danish legal market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, presence of key security headers, and a robust cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot. The use of Hotjar for analytics is managed with user consent, aligning with GDPR requirements. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a dedicated security policy or incident response contact information limits the firm's transparency regarding security governance. Implementing a security.txt file and publishing incident response procedures would enhance their security maturity and client trust. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved to meet higher standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website.
  2. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  3. Add a clear terms of service page to improve legal transparency.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet WCAG standards.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and update cookie consent details.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aumento Law firm
Description
A modern law office in the heart of Copenhagen, offering a wide range of knowledge from independent partners who are ready to help you.
Key services
Legal advice, Representation, Practice areas covering 25 specialties
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Fonts (Lato), Cookiebot, Hotjar, Finsweet CMS Filter/Sort/Load/Slider
Platforms
Webflow CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookiebot
  3. No explicit terms of service page found
  4. Contact information is detailed and professional
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  7. Good security posture with HTTPS and security headers
  8. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing Google Fonts (Lato), Cookiebot for cookie consent, Hotjar for user behavior analytics, and Finsweet attributes for CMS filtering and sorting. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity and SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization in loading speed and accessibility. The technical implementation follows modern web standards, but could benefit from enhanced accessibility features and additional compliance documentation. Hosting is managed by Webflow, providing reliable infrastructure and SSL support.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aumento.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aumento.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.