Skip to main content

Security report for auguspeks.lv

SIA "Augu spēks" · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.auguspeks.lv represents a small Latvian family business operating under the name SIA "Augu spēks". The business focuses on agricultural production, specifically raspberry farming, natural plant protection products, and rural tourism services including farm visits and dome rentals. The site offers an e-commerce platform for product sales and provides information about their services and team. The market position is local and niche, targeting consumers interested in natural agricultural products and rural tourism experiences. Technically, the website is built on the Mozello CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies such as jQuery, Fancybox, and Google Fonts. It uses Amazon Cloudfront as a CDN and integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for tracking and marketing purposes. The site is mobile optimized and uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure communication. However, some security headers are missing, and accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy and terms of service pages exist but are basic and lack detailed GDPR compliance indicators. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy, but the website content and social media presence support its authenticity. Overall, the website is functional, professionally presented, and suitable for its business purpose. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy policy detail, and accessibility could enhance trust and compliance. The lack of explicit contact information on the site is a minor concern for business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching auguspeks.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the agriculture and rural tourism sectors, combining product manufacturing with experiential services. Their business model includes direct sales via an online store and on-site tourism activities such as raspberry picking and dome rentals. The target customers are local consumers and tourists interested in natural, sustainable products and rural experiences. The company leverages social media channels for marketing and customer engagement. There is no indication of large-scale operations or subsidiaries, positioning the business as a small family enterprise. The presence of privacy and terms policies indicates awareness of regulatory requirements, though these are basic. The company appears to maintain a consistent brand image and offers a clear value proposition centered on natural products and community involvement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted data transmission. Cookie consent is implemented, reflecting some privacy compliance efforts. Tracking technologies include Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel, which collect user data with moderate tracking levels. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policies are present, and no incident response contacts are found. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are missing, which could expose the site to certain web attacks. The login and registration forms are present but lack visible advanced security features like CAPTCHA or multi-factor authentication. Overall, the security posture is moderate, suitable for a small business but with room for improvement in headers and formal security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Enhance privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR compliance and data retention practices.
  3. Add a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Improve accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for better user experience and compliance.
  5. Provide clear and verified contact information including company email and phone numbers to increase business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "Augu spēks"
Description
Ģimenes kopiniciatīva, kas apvieno piemājas saimniecību "Mūsu avenes" un mājražošanas uzņēmumu SIA "Augu spēks" un attīsta pilna cikla augkopības produktu ražošanu un piedāvā lauku tūrisma pakalpojumus.
Key services
Augkopības produktu ražošana, Lauku tūrisma pakalpojumi, E-veikals ar produktiem, Aveņu pašlasīšana, Kupola īre un ekskursijas
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Facebook Pixel, Cloudfront CDN, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Engaga
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Latvian with some English language option.
  3. Site uses HTTPS with valid SSL and modern tracking technologies.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present but basic.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  6. Login and registration forms exist but no visible security issues.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  9. No explicit business certifications or security frameworks mentioned.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Mozello CMS and uses a combination of jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. It is hosted behind Amazon Cloudfront CDN, which improves content delivery performance. Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are integrated for analytics and marketing tracking. The site uses responsive design techniques and includes a cookie consent banner. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. However, the site lacks modern security headers and advanced accessibility features. The HTML structure is valid and SEO basics such as meta description and canonical link are present. There is potential for modernization by updating JavaScript libraries and enhancing security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with auguspeks.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review auguspeks.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.