Skip to main content

Security report for audit-obrazku.cz

Feed Image Editor technologies, s.r.o. · E-commerce · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Feed Image Editor technologies, s.r.o. operates the website audit-obrazku.cz, offering a specialized free audit service for product images aimed at e-commerce businesses. The company leverages integrations with multiple advertising and comparison platforms to enhance product image quality and improve online advertising effectiveness. The website is professionally designed, with clear navigation and good mobile optimization, reflecting a mature digital presence for a small-sized company founded in 2020 in the Czech Republic. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including React, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and CookieHub for consent management, hosted behind Cloudflare for security and performance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly disclosed. Privacy compliance is well addressed with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the domain registration data aligns with the company information, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching audit-obrazku.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche service provider in the e-commerce sector, focusing on improving product image quality to boost advertising performance. Its business model appears to be B2B SaaS or service-oriented, targeting online retailers and e-shops. The presence of multiple language versions and integration with many advertising channels suggests a strategy for regional expansion. The parent company, Profitak group, provides additional corporate backing. Trust signals such as SourceForge and Product Hunt badges, along with membership in the Czech e-commerce association, enhance credibility. The company’s ecosystem includes related domains like feed-image-editor.cz, indicating a broader service portfolio. Growth potential lies in expanding platform integrations and deepening analytics capabilities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced and Cloudflare protection. Cookie consent is managed via CookieHub, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of publicly available security policies or incident response contacts suggests room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing vigilance to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced documentation and explicit security governance disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  2. Ensure all recommended security headers (e.g., X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) are implemented and documented.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Expand transparency around data retention and processing practices to strengthen GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Feed Image Editor technologies, s.r.o.
Registration number
07139365
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Feed Image Editor technologies, s.r.o.
Description
Zajistěte nejlepší kvalitu svých produktových obrázků a přilákejte více zákazníků na reklamních platformách.
Key services
Product image audit, Feed URL analysis, Recommendations for image improvements, Integration with multiple advertising and comparison platforms
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Calendly widget, CookieHub consent management, Profitak tracking scripts
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Cloudflare for DDoS and WAF protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Pixel
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Profitak tracking
Marketing tools
Calendly, CookieHub
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides a free audit service for product images targeting e-commerce businesses.
  2. Strong integration with multiple advertising and comparison platforms.
  3. Good use of modern web technologies and consent management.
  4. Clear contact options and business transparency.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern front-end technologies, likely React, with CSS-in-JS (emotion) styling. It integrates multiple third-party services including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Calendly, and CookieHub for analytics, scheduling, and consent management. Hosting is via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and asynchronous analytics. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. Mobile optimization is good, though accessibility is basic and could be improved. The technical stack is well-suited for the business purpose but should maintain vigilance on third-party dependencies and security headers to minimize risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with audit-obrazku.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review audit-obrazku.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.