Skip to main content

Security report for audit-obrazkov.sk

Feed Image Editor technologies, s.r.o. · E-commerce · Slovakia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Feed Image Editor technologies, s.r.o. operates the website audit-obrazkov.sk, providing a specialized online service for auditing product images to improve e-commerce advertising effectiveness. The company targets online retailers and e-commerce businesses, offering integrations with multiple advertising and comparison platforms. The website is professionally designed, consistent in branding, and provides clear user pathways for submitting product feed URLs and receiving audit results. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including React, Google Analytics, Google Ads, and Cloudflare for security and performance. GDPR compliance is well implemented with a cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, DNSSEC, and no visible vulnerabilities. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are absent, representing an area for improvement. Overall, the site is trustworthy, well-maintained, and aligned with the business's stated goals.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching audit-obrazkov.sk

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company occupies a niche in the e-commerce sector, focusing on product image quality auditing to enhance advertising performance. Its business model is SaaS-based, providing automated audits via feed URLs. The company is relatively young, founded in 2020, and is part of the Profitak group. It maintains a consistent brand presence across related domains and social media channels. The service integrates with a broad ecosystem of advertising platforms, indicating strategic partnerships and a comprehensive market approach. The presence of badges from Product Hunt and SourceForge, along with membership in APEK, enhances credibility. The company appears to be small-sized but focused on growth within the e-commerce technology space.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, DNSSEC, and use of Cloudflare for bot mitigation. Cookie consent is implemented with granular user controls, supporting GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy or incident response page limits transparency in security governance. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the business scale but could be enhanced by formalizing security policies and incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Create and maintain a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Feed Image Editor technologies, s.r.o.
Registration number
07139365
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Feed Image Editor technologies, s.r.o.
Description
Zabezpečte najlepšiu kvalitu svojich produktových obrázkov a prilákajte viac zákazníkov na reklamných platformách.
Key services
Product image audit, Feed validation for e-shops, Integration with multiple advertising and comparison platforms
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Google Ads, Calendly widget, CookieHub, Cloudflare (for CDN and bot protection), React (inferred from emotion css and JS bundles), Profitak analytics
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • DNSSEC enabled
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Cloudflare for bot mitigation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Profitak
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Profitak
Marketing tools
Calendly, CookieHub
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Strong GDPR and cookie compliance with clear consent mechanism.
  3. Multiple social media and external links to related services.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. No visible security or privacy red flags.
  6. Business is a small Slovak company focused on e-commerce image auditing.
  7. Clear contact options via email and contact form.
  8. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly found.
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response page detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and employs multiple third-party services such as Google Analytics, Google Ads, Calendly, and CookieHub. Hosting is provided by Gigaserver.cz with DNSSEC enabled, indicating a secure DNS configuration. Performance is moderate with deferred loading of scripts and asynchronous analytics. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Technical risks are minimal but ongoing maintenance of third-party integrations is recommended to avoid potential security or performance issues.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with audit-obrazkov.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review audit-obrazkov.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.