Skip to main content

Security report for aubret.com

Aubret · Manufacturing · France

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aubret is a well-established French manufacturer specializing in charcuterie products, notably lardons, with a strong market position as the leading European producer. The company operates multiple production units and serves a broad client base including culinary brands and consumers, with a significant presence in mainland France and the Antilles. The website reflects a professional digital presence built on WordPress, incorporating modern tracking and consent management tools. Security posture is good with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though improvements such as DNSSEC and enhanced security headers are recommended. Overall, the site is accessible, compliant with GDPR, and presents trustworthy business information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aubret.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
80
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention aubret.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for aubret.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company leverages its long history since 1983 and domain age since 1997 to establish credibility. It focuses on manufacturing and wholesale distribution in the food sector, with a specialization in charcuterie. The business model is product manufacturing with a strong emphasis on quality and customer service. The website content and structure support clear communication of product lines and corporate values, including sustainability commitments. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are published, favoring contact forms, which may limit direct outreach but supports privacy. The company uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and Didomi for consent management, indicating awareness of privacy and marketing best practices.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent banner compliant with GDPR. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a missed opportunity to secure DNS queries. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options are not detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, which is a gap in transparency and security readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced with additional headers and policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement Content-Security-Policy and other recommended security headers to mitigate XSS and clickjacking risks.
  3. Publish a security policy or vulnerability disclosure page to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Consider adding explicit contact information such as company emails or phone numbers for better customer and security communication.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aubret
Description
Premier fabricant français de lardons, spécialiste des aides culinaires charcutières crues et cuites, implantée en Loire Atlantique depuis 1983. Commercialise près de 40 000 tonnes de produits finis chaque année avec un chiffre d’affaires de 170 millions d’euros. Offre une large gamme de charcuteries, notamment lardons, jambons, saucisses, ribs, et produits spécifiques pour les Antilles.
Key services
Fabrication de lardons, Découpe à façon, Production de ribs et co-produits de viande de porc, Distribution de charcuterie pour marchés français et Antilles
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Didomi Consent SDK
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Didomi Consent SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in French and professionally presented.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms are implemented.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML; contact form is primary contact method.
  5. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  7. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content provided.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Gravity Forms and uses jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site loads external scripts asynchronously, improving performance. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO practices are evident with meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for navigation and organization. Hosting appears to be with Gandi SAS, consistent with the registrar information. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing images and scripts. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced with ARIA roles and better keyboard navigation support.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aubret.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aubret.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.