Skip to main content

Security report for atriagroup.com

Atria Oyj · Manufacturing · Finland

High risk. 18 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Atria Oyj is a leading North European food company specializing in the manufacturing and marketing of food products. The company emphasizes sustainable food production, animal welfare, and environmental responsibility. Their website targets consumers, professionals, investors, and job seekers, providing comprehensive information about their brands, sustainability efforts, and investor relations. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks (likely Vue.js), integrates Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for consent management, and Microsoft Application Insights for telemetry, hosted likely on Microsoft Azure. The website is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and professionally designed, reflecting a mature digital presence. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms but lacks explicit security policies or vulnerability disclosure pages. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the domain appears legitimate with privacy-protected WHOIS data justified by the business type.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

18 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Telnet

      Port 23 (Telnet) is publicly accessible - Telnet - Unencrypted remote access

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Telnet using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching atriagroup.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
85
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
40
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Atria holds a strong market position as a leading food company in Northern Europe, with a diversified portfolio of brands and subsidiaries across Finland, Sweden, Denmark, and Estonia. Their business model focuses on food manufacturing and retail, supported by active investor relations and recruitment efforts. The company leverages partnerships with e-commerce platforms like lihakauppa.fi and maintains a clear brand identity. Growth indicators include active news updates, sustainability initiatives, and strategic communications. The website content and linked domains confirm a well-established corporate structure and market presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR. However, it lacks visible security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for transparency and trust. No security headers were detected in the HTML content, and no vulnerable libraries or exposed credentials were found. The use of Microsoft Application Insights indicates telemetry monitoring, but further improvements in security headers and published policies are recommended to enhance the security posture and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website.
  2. Add a vulnerability disclosure page or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Ensure all forms have secure submission methods and robust server-side validation.
  5. Maintain transparency by providing contact channels for security incidents and data protection inquiries.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Atria Oyj
VAT number
FI08410661
Registration number
0841066-1
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Atria Oyj
Description
Atria-konserni on johtava pohjoiseurooppalainen ruokatalo, joka valmistaa ja markkinoi elintarvikkeita. Yritys keskittyy vastuulliseen ruoantuotantoon, eläinten hyvinvointiin ja kestävään kehitykseen.
Key services
Elintarvikkeiden valmistus, Brändituotteiden markkinointi, Sijoittajaviestintä, Työnantajamarkkinointi
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js (implied by data-v- attributes), Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Microsoft Application Insights, Euroland tools integration
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by external scripts loaded over HTTPS)
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Application Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Microsoft Application Insights
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  3. Privacy policy is present and GDPR compliant.
  4. No explicit terms of service found.
  5. Contact information includes multiple physical addresses and phone numbers for different country offices.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools.
  8. Good branding consistency and professional design.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. WHOIS privacy protection is used but justified for this business type.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack, likely using Vue.js framework and EpiServer CMS, hosted on Microsoft Azure. It integrates third-party services such as Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for cookie consent, and Microsoft Application Insights for telemetry. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and accessibility features, though accessibility could be improved. Performance is moderate, with video content and image carousels that may impact load times. The technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and formalized security documentation to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with atriagroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review atriagroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.