Skip to main content

Security report for atos.net

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in OffSeq Observations, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website atos.net is currently inaccessible due to a web application firewall block by Claranet WebFence, preventing access to any meaningful content or metadata. The domain is well-established, created in 1997, and registered with CSC Corporate Domains, Inc., indicating a legitimate and mature business presence. Due to the blocked content, no detailed analysis of business operations, technical infrastructure, or security posture can be performed. The lack of accessible content also prevents evaluation of privacy compliance, contact information, or marketing practices. Overall, the site appears to be protected by security mechanisms that restrict external analysis.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. OffSeq Observations

    • High

      AI Analysis Finding

      Content blocked by web application firewall preventing analysis

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 25 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching atos.net

This scan found 23 issues across 7 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
59
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention atos.net, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
13,792
Employees
162
Customers
6,265
Third parties
7,365
Weak passwords
14%

Latest record dated 2026-07-05 · 313 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for atos.net.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –gia-pas.it-solutions.atos.net2026-07-05
  • –fidm.access.it-solutions.atos.net2026-06-25
  • –fidm.access.it-solutions.atos.net2026-06-25
  • –portal.tst2.ct2.atos.net2026-06-21
  • –top.br.atos.net2026-06-21

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate atos.net and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
72
Registered
72
Resolving
72
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-29

Masked preview

  • yt•••.netMediumreplacement
  • ad•••.netMediumbitsquatting
  • at•••.netMediumbitsquatting

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of atos.net with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No business intelligence data could be extracted from the blocked content. The domain age and registrar suggest a stable business entity, but no further insights into market positioning, services, or partnerships are available.

Security posture

The presence of a web application firewall (Claranet WebFence) indicates a proactive security posture to protect the website from malicious requests. However, no further details on security policies, incident response, or certifications are available due to content blocking. The domain registration status flags enhance domain security by preventing unauthorized changes.

Recommendations

  1. Provide a publicly accessible version of the website or a staging environment for external analysis.
  2. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies accessible without firewall restrictions.
  3. Include contact information and incident response channels on publicly accessible pages.
  4. Implement security headers and disclose security certifications to improve trust.
  5. Consider providing a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy for transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Request blocked by Claranet WebFence web application firewall detected in HTML content. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by a web application firewall (Claranet WebFence).
  2. No actual website content is accessible for analysis.
  3. No metadata, forms, external links, or contact information found in the provided HTML.
  4. WHOIS data indicates a long-established domain with proper registration and protection statuses.
  5. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected in the blocked content.
  6. No security policies, incident response contacts, or certifications found in the accessible content.
  7. No analytics, advertising, or tracking technologies detected due to blocked content.
  8. Content safety is rated safe as no adult or explicit content is present.
  9. Analysis incomplete due to WAF/security mechanisms. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com.
Technical notes

Notes

Due to the web application firewall block, no technical details about the website's infrastructure, CMS, hosting provider, or performance could be determined. The domain uses multiple name servers and has domain status flags that enhance security. No scripts, meta tags, or SEO elements were accessible for analysis.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 56/100Medium21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with atos.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review atos.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.