Skip to main content

Security report for atomhamster.com

Atomhamster.com · Other · Germany

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Atomhamster.com is a personal blog operated by Yannick Baierl, focusing on Shisha culture, lifestyle, and related video content primarily in German. The website has been active since 2011 and maintains a niche presence with regular blog posts and integrated YouTube videos. The business model centers on content creation and community engagement rather than direct commerce. Technically, the site runs on WordPress with common plugins such as Yoast SEO and integrates social media platforms including Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, and Twitch. Hosting appears to be provided by netcup, inferred from DNS records. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO, with good content quality and consistent branding.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching atomhamster.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention atomhamster.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
35
Employees
0
Customers
35
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
6%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for atomhamster.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets Shisha enthusiasts and a general German-speaking audience interested in lifestyle content. It operates as a small-scale personal blog without evident commercial transactions. The market position is niche with a loyal audience, supported by active social media channels. The blog has evolved from a former online shop to a content-focused platform. No formal business certifications or partnerships are evident. The site leverages advertising through Google AdSense and tracks user behavior via Google Analytics and Tag Manager, indicating monetization through ads and audience insights.

Security posture

The site uses HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and does not implement common security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. The presence of Google reCAPTCHA on contact forms is a positive security measure against spam. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap, especially under GDPR. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the provided data. Overall, the security posture is basic and could benefit from improvements in DNS security, header implementation, and privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and incident response.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to minimize security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Atomhamster.com
Description
Ein Blog von Yannick Baierl
Key services
Blog articles, YouTube video content, Social media engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.4.5, PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Ultimate Social Media Icons
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal blog focused on Shisha culture and lifestyle.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact available only via contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and social media integration.
  5. No advanced security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  6. Advertising via Google AdSense and tracking via Google Analytics present.
  7. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  8. No evidence of business certifications or formal security policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with Bootstrap and Font Awesome for styling and icons. It uses jQuery and several JavaScript libraries for UI and social media integration. Performance is moderate with standard SEO optimizations via Yoast SEO. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic. The site includes Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. Hosting is via netcup, a reputable German hosting provider. There is room for technical modernization, especially in security headers and DNS configuration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with atomhamster.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review atomhamster.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.