Skip to main content

Security report for atleticodallas.com

Atlético Dallas · Other · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Atlético Dallas is a newly established professional soccer club based in Dallas, Texas, aiming to bring world-class soccer talent and community engagement to North Texas. The website serves as the official digital presence for the club, providing information about the team, matchday experiences, and community initiatives. The club positions itself as a fresh entrant in the competitive USL soccer ecosystem, targeting local soccer fans and the broader sports community. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern technologies including React and integrates various marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Klaviyo. The site is well-optimized for SEO and mobile devices, with a cookie consent mechanism and a privacy policy linked to the USL's comprehensive privacy framework. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and standard security headers present, though some security and compliance documentation such as terms of service and incident response contacts are missing. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable anomaly, potentially indicating privacy protection or data retrieval issues, which slightly impacts trustworthiness. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and compliant with privacy regulations, supporting the club's business objectives effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching atleticodallas.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
45
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Atlético Dallas operates within the professional sports sector, specifically soccer, targeting the North Texas market. The club leverages partnerships with USL and related leagues to establish credibility and market presence. The business model focuses on sports entertainment, community engagement, and fan experience monetization. The website reflects a small but growing organization with a clear brand identity and consistent messaging. The club's digital ecosystem includes social media channels and integration with marketing platforms, indicating a strategic approach to fan engagement and growth. The lack of direct contact information and incomplete WHOIS data suggest areas for improvement in transparency and business credibility. The club's association with established leagues and presence in multiple soccer networks enhances its competitive positioning and partnership ecosystem.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, presence of key security headers, and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in comprehensive security governance. The integration of third-party marketing and analytics tools introduces moderate tracking and data collection, managed through consent banners. Overall, the site balances user privacy and marketing needs effectively but should enhance transparency around security policies and incident response to strengthen trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Add clear incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Develop and publish terms of service to clarify user rights and obligations.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Atlético Dallas
Description
Welcome to Atlético Dallas — the newest professional soccer club bringing world-class talent, community pride, and thrilling matchday experiences to North Texas.
Key services
Professional soccer matches, Community engagement, Fan experiences
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, React, Font Awesome, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Klaviyo, Osano Consent Management
Frameworks
React
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Klaviyo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Klaviyo, ShareThis
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and focused on a professional soccer club.
  2. Uses modern web technologies and standard SEO practices.
  3. Includes cookie consent and privacy policy linking to USL's privacy policy.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual for an active domain.
  6. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube.
  8. Multiple external links to USL and affiliated soccer leagues and teams.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform enhanced with React components and uses popular libraries such as Font Awesome for icons. It integrates multiple third-party services including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Klaviyo for marketing automation, and Osano for cookie consent management. The site uses modern SEO practices with Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format to improve search engine visibility. Performance is moderate with some external dependencies but generally optimized for mobile and desktop. The site lacks explicit hosting provider information but uses CDN and external resources from reputable domains. Technical debt appears low, though continuous monitoring of third-party scripts is recommended to avoid security risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with atleticodallas.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review atleticodallas.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.