Skip to main content

Security report for atletica.com

ATLETICA · E-commerce · Mexico

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ATLETICA operates as a small e-commerce business specializing in athletic-related products, leveraging the Shopify platform for its online storefront. The website is currently password protected, indicating a private or pre-launch phase. The company targets consumers interested in athletic wear, primarily in Mexico, as evidenced by geo-redirects and social media presence. The domain is well-established, registered since 1998, which supports the legitimacy of the business. However, the website content is basic with limited public information and no visible privacy or cookie policies, which impacts compliance and user trust. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies and Shopify's infrastructure, ensuring a moderate level of performance and mobile optimization. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers suggests room for improvement in security hardening. The site uses HTTPS exclusively, and password protection adds a layer of access control. Analytics and marketing pixels are present, indicating moderate user tracking. From a security perspective, the site benefits from Shopify's platform security but lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap, especially under GDPR. The domain registration data aligns well with the website's business claims, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, ATLETICA presents as a legitimate small e-commerce business with a solid technical foundation but requires enhancements in privacy compliance, security headers, and public policy disclosures to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching atletica.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ATLETICA is positioned as a niche athletic apparel retailer operating through a Shopify-based e-commerce platform. The business model is direct-to-consumer, focusing on online sales with a targeted audience in Mexico and potentially broader markets. The domain's longevity since 1998 suggests an established presence, though the current password protection indicates a controlled or phased launch. The company leverages social media (Instagram) for marketing and customer engagement. Revenue streams likely include product sales and possibly email marketing for customer acquisition. The partnership ecosystem is limited to Shopify and related service providers. Strategic observations include the need to expand public-facing content and compliance documentation to support growth and customer trust.

Security posture

The security posture of ATLETICA is moderate, benefiting from Shopify's secure hosting and HTTPS enforcement. Password protection on the storefront adds access control, reducing exposure. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security represent areas for improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security events. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, posing regulatory risks. Overall, the site is secure for basic e-commerce operations but should enhance security best practices and compliance transparency to mitigate risks and build customer confidence.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies on the website to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  4. Add incident response contact information and consider a vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security transparency.
  5. Enhance website content with clear business information and trust signals to improve user confidence and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ATLETICA
Description
ATLETICA is an e-commerce store likely focused on athletic apparel or related products, as indicated by branding and imagery. The site is currently password protected, indicating a private or pre-launch status.
Key services
Online retail of athletic products, Email notification for store access
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Shopify, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Web fonts (Inter), JSON-LD structured data
Frameworks
Shopify Liquid (implied), Shopify storefront scripts
Platforms
Shopify
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Password protection for storefront
  • Use of Shopify's built-in security features

Analytics and tracking

Services
Shopify Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Shopify pixel, Facebook pixel (implied by app ID), Google Analytics (implied by Shopify analytics)
Marketing tools
Shopify marketing apps
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is password protected, limiting full content access.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the password page.
  3. Contact form collects email for notifications; no phone or physical address provided.
  4. Social media presence limited to Instagram link.
  5. Uses Shopify platform with standard Shopify scripts and analytics.
  6. No DNSSEC enabled; security headers not visible in provided data.
  7. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. Domain is old and registered without privacy protection, indicating legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Shopify platform, utilizing modern web technologies including JavaScript modules, CSS variables, and web fonts. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, leveraging Shopify's CDN and infrastructure. The technical implementation is clean with valid HTML and CSS, but lacks advanced SEO metadata and accessibility enhancements. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security hardening. The site uses standard Shopify analytics and marketing pixels, which provide moderate user tracking capabilities. Overall, the technical foundation is solid but can be improved with enhanced security configurations and richer metadata for SEO and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with atletica.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review atletica.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.