Skip to main content

Security report for atlanticcouncil.org

Atlantic Council · Government · United States

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

86/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Atlantic Council is a well-established nonpartisan think tank focused on shaping global policy, particularly in transatlantic relations and global security. The organization provides in-depth research, expert analysis, and hosts events to influence public policy and international cooperation. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content and professional branding, targeting policymakers, academics, and global affairs stakeholders. Technically, the site is built on WordPress and leverages modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Marketo, HubSpot, and New Relic for performance monitoring. The site is mobile-optimized, SEO-friendly, and employs HTTPS with good security headers, indicating a solid technical infrastructure. From a security perspective, the website follows best practices including HTTPS enforcement and content security policies. However, explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly available, which could be improved to enhance transparency and trust. Overall, the Atlantic Council website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, security, and compliance suitable for a large non-profit organization. The absence of WHOIS data is likely due to privacy protection, which is justified for this entity. Strategic recommendations include publishing detailed security and incident response policies and implementing a vulnerability disclosure program to further strengthen their security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing X-XSS-Protection header

      Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

      What to do: Add "X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Medium

      SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

      SSL certificate expires in 55 days

      What to do: Plan SSL certificate renewal

    • Medium

      Mixed Content Detected

      6 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

      What to do: Ensure all resources (images, scripts, stylesheets) are loaded over HTTPS

Keep watching atlanticcouncil.org

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
80
Email security
83
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
86

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention atlanticcouncil.org, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
3
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for atlanticcouncil.org.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Atlantic Council operates as a large non-profit think tank with a focus on government and policy sectors. It holds a strong market position as a reputable source of global policy research and analysis. The organization’s business model revolves around research publications, events, and expert commentary to influence policy and public discourse. Their target audience includes government officials, policy makers, academics, and the informed public. The website’s extensive content, clear navigation, and professional design support their mission and outreach efforts. The use of advanced marketing and analytics tools indicates a mature digital strategy aimed at engagement and growth. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting independent operation. The organization’s branding is consistent and trust signals such as privacy policies and secure connections are present.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers likely in place. The use of monitoring tools like New Relic and Hotjar indicates active performance and security monitoring. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of publicly available security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure programs represents a gap in transparency and preparedness. The WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which is common and justified for non-profit organizations. Recommendations include publishing explicit security policies, incident response procedures, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure mechanism to improve security culture and stakeholder trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information page to enhance transparency.
  2. Implement and publicly disclose a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain security and trustworthiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance contact information for security incidents, including dedicated security or abuse email addresses.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Atlantic Council
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Atlantic Council
Description
The Atlantic Council is a nonpartisan organization that galvanizes US global leadership and engagement in partnership with allies and partners.
Key services
Policy research and analysis, Publications and reports, Events and conferences, Expert commentary and media engagement
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Tag Manager, Marketo, HubSpot, YouTube API, Vimeo Player, jQuery, New Relic Browser monitoring, Hotjar
Frameworks
Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CSP violation event listener
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security monitoring tools (New Relic)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel, Marketo
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW- IDs present)
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Marketo, HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. Professional and consistent branding throughout
  3. Strong SEO and metadata implementation
  4. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools
  5. No exposed sensitive information or obvious vulnerabilities
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query failure or privacy protection
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  8. Contact information is available but no direct phone numbers found in HTML
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
Technical notes

Notes

The Atlantic Council website is built on WordPress CMS and integrates a variety of modern technologies including Google Tag Manager, Marketo, HubSpot, Vimeo and YouTube APIs, jQuery, and New Relic for monitoring. The site uses Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and is optimized for mobile devices with good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed. The technical implementation reflects a mature infrastructure suitable for a large non-profit organization. No critical technical debt or risks were identified, but continuous monitoring and updates are recommended to maintain security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with atlanticcouncil.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review atlanticcouncil.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.